Scams to Be Aware of in 2026
Malaysians lost approximately RM2.77 billion to scams in 2025. In 2026, let us not repeat the same mistakes again!
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:A Batu Pahat housewife lost RM239,000 after being lured into a fake online investment scheme that displayed fabricated profits of RM663,000.

A housewife in Batu Pahat has lost RM239,000 to a fabricated investment scheme, a case that highlights how quickly online financial scams can escalate and how easily everyday investors can be drawn into sophisticated digital traps.
The victim, a 35-year-old Chinese national, was first contacted by an unknown individual in late October last year. What began as a casual online approach soon developed into detailed investment discussions conducted entirely through WhatsApp. Police said the suspect presented the scheme as a rare opportunity, emphasising high and rapid returns that appeared both convincing and attainable.
Investigators noted that the fraud followed a familiar but effective pattern. Trust was built gradually, with reassurances designed to lower the victims defences. The absence of face-to-face interaction did little to slow the process, reflecting how modern scams rely on constant online communication to create a sense of legitimacy and urgency.
Between mid-December and late January, the victim transferred money in stages to five separate bank accounts. The transactions, spread over several weeks, totalled RM239,000. Such staggered payments are often used to make the scheme appear routine and to prevent victims from realising the scale of their losses until it is too late.
To maintain control over the situation, the perpetrators provided access to an investment application displaying steady and dramatic growth. The app showed profits exceeding RM663,000, a figure designed to trigger excitement and reinforce the belief that the investment was succeeding. Authorities believe these figures were entirely fabricated, serving only to keep the victim engaged and compliant.
The turning point came when the woman attempted to withdraw her apparent gains. Instead of receiving funds, she was told that additional payments were required to unlock the profits. These demands, commonly disguised as processing or release fees, are a critical warning sign of fraud. The victim refused to make further transfers, at which point communication broke down.
Realising that the profits existed only on screen, she reported the matter to the police. The case is now being investigated under Section 420 of the Penal Code, which addresses cheating and dishonest inducement. Investigators are tracing the flow of funds and examining the bank accounts used in the scheme.
Under no circumstances should you engage with an investment scheme advertised on social media that promises high returns or sounds too good to be true without exercising caution. If in doubt, download the free WikiFX mobile application from Google Play or the App Store. This global broker regulatory query platform, at your fingertips, provides detailed information about brokers, including their regulatory status, customer reviews, and safety ratings. It allows users to verify the legitimacy of investment platforms before committing their money. With access to in-depth insights and risk alerts, WikiFX equips potential investors with the tools to make informed decisions and steer clear of unauthorised or unlicensed entities. By using WikiFX, users can safeguard their savings and avoid the costly traps of fraudulent investment syndicates.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Malaysians lost approximately RM2.77 billion to scams in 2025. In 2026, let us not repeat the same mistakes again!

Have you had to encounter numerous denials on fund withdrawals by KapitalRS, a Serbia-based CFD broker? Were you asked to pay additional fees for withdrawal access? Did you incur losses on your forex positions due to the confusion concerning the bonus? Does your overall trading cost go up due to the wide spreads charged by the forex broker? These issues have arguably become the highlight on several broker review platforms. In this KapitalRS article, we have elaborated on numerous complaints against the brokerage firm. Take a look!

Trive, a Netherlands-based leading CFD broker across forex, stocks, indices and commodities, is facing ire from its employees on the unpaid salary crisis that has haunted them for four months starting from November 2025. Upset over such a long delay, employees have been using social media platforms to express their frustration. Read on for more revelation.

Did you have a good trading experience with LONG ASIA initially before it went bad, as you sought fund withdrawals from the platform? Did Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex brokerage house deny you access to funds despite numerous withdrawal requests? Have you lost your funds because of this denial? Failing to log in despite numerous attempts? You are not alone! Many traders have accused the broker of these trading practices. In this LONG ASIA review article, we have highlighted some complaints against the broker. Read on as we share all these details with you.