简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
BitMex Co-Founders Plead Guilty to Breaking U.S Bank Secrecy Act
Abstract:Last year, BitMEX paid a $100m penalty for breaching U.S laws. This week, co-founders Delo and Hayes each paid $10m after pleading guilty overnight.

BitMEX co-founders Delo and Hayes plead guilty to violating the Bank Secrecy Act
In 2021, crypto derivatives trading platform BitMEX paid a $100m penalty for breaches of U.S laws
Increased regulatory scrutiny will likely see more hefty fines on the horizon
Co-founders Arthur Hayes, Ben Delo, and Samuel Reed established BitMEX, a P2P crypto trading platform in 2014. The platform supports crypto derivatives trading, including futures and margin trading.
BitMEX Co-Founders Plead Guilty
Overnight, the U.S Department of Justice announced that BitMEX co-founders Delo and Hayes have pleaded guilty to violating the US Bank Secrecy Act. “Hayes and Delo each agreed to pay a $10 million criminal fine representing pecuniary gain derived from the offense.”
In 2020, co-founders Hayes, Delo, and Reed were accused of operating an unregistered trading platform. The Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) accused Hayes, Delo, and Reed of violating CFTC rules reportedly that included anti-money laundering and KYC regulations.
For evading anti-money laundering requirements, co-founders Hayes, Delo, and Reed, as well as Greg Dwyer (head of business development), were also charged with violating the Bank Secrecy Act.
BitMEX Pays $100m Penalty
In August 2021, U.S federal courts entered a consent order against 5 companies charged with operating the BitMEX crypto derivatives trading platform.
The order required the five entities to pay a $100m penalty in addition to prohibiting BitMEX from further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTCs regulations.
According to the order, BitMex operated as a common enterprise from at least November 2014 to October 2020. The platform reportedly offered leveraged trading of crypto derivatives to retail and institutional clients. BitMEX was aware of U.S customer access to the platform.
In the U.S, BitMEX violated rules under the CEA by enabling the trading or processing of swaps without approval as a Designated Contract Market (DCM) or a Swap Execution Facility (SEF).
Regulatory Scrutiny Keeps Exchanges in Focus
Since late last year, regulators have increased scrutiny of the crypto market. This month BlockFi paid a $100m penalty in an SEC settlement. In November 2021, the SEC alleged that BlockFis high-yielding accounts were unregistered securities.
While the conclusion to the BlockFi case was swift, the SEC v Ripple Lab (XRP) case has been ongoing since late 2020.
Other exchanges that have recently faced U.S regulatory scrutiny include Coinbase (COIN) and Binance (BNB).

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Seaprimecapitals Withdrawal Problems: A Complete Guide to Risks and User Experiences
Worries about Seaprimecapitals withdrawal problems and possible Seaprimecapitals withdrawal delay are important for any trader. Being able to get your money quickly and reliably is the foundation of trust between a trader and their broker. When questions come up about this basic process, it's important to look into what's causing them. This guide will tackle these concerns head-on, giving you a clear, fact-based look at Seaprimecapitals' withdrawal processes, user experiences, and trading conditions. Most importantly, we'll connect these real-world issues to the single most important factor behind them: whether the broker is properly regulated. Understanding this connection is key to figuring out the real risk to your capital and making a smart decision.

Seacrest Markets Exposed: Are You Facing Payout Denials and Spread Issues with This Prop Firm?
Seacrest Markets has garnered wrath from traders owing to a variety of reasons, including payout denials for traders winning trading challenges, high slippage causing losses, the lack of response from the customer support official to address withdrawal issues, and more. Irritated by these trading inefficiencies, a lot of traders have given a negative review of Seacrest Markets prop firm. In this article, we have shared some of them. Take a look!

GKFX Review: Are Traders Facing Slippage and Account Freeze Issues?
Witnessing capital losses despite tall investment return assurances by GKFX officials? Do these officials sound too difficult for you to judge, whether they offer real or fake advice? Do you encounter slippage issues causing a profit reduction on the GKFX login? Is account freezing usual at GKFX? Does the United Kingdom-based forex broker prevent you from accessing withdrawals? You are not alone! In this GKFX review guide, we have shared the complaints. Take a look!

Is Seaprimecapitals Regulated? A Complete Look at Its Safety and How It Works
The straightforward answer to this important question is no. Seaprimecapitals works as a broker without proper regulation. This fact is the most important thing any trader needs to know, because it creates serious risks for your capital and how safely the company operates. While this broker offers some good features, like the popular MetaTrader 5 platform and a low starting deposit, these benefits cannot make up for the major risks that come from having no real financial supervision. This article will give you a detailed, fact-based look at Seaprimecapitals regulation, what the company claims to do, the services it provides, and the clear differences between official information and user reviews. Our purpose is to give you the information you need to make a smart decision about the risks and benefits of working with this company.
