简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
FINRA Fines RBC Capital Markets $360k for Supervisory Failure
Abstract:The failure occurred between June 2018 and February 2020. FINRA recently fined RBC Capital Markets $90k over anticipatory hedging violations.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has hit RBC Capital Markets, a Toronto-headquartered global investment bank, with a censure order and monetary fine of $360,000 for the failure of its supervisory system between June 2018 and February 2020.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London. This year we have expanded to new verticals in Online Trading, Fintech, Digital Assets, Blockchain, and Payments.
The bank, whose principal place of business is in New York, the United States, provides securities transaction and clearance services to its customers and those of its introducing brokers.
FINRA, a membership-based self-regulatory body, said the penalty is for the company‘s failure to “timely or reasonably monitor thousands of employee outside brokerage account statements for compliance with the firm’s trading restrictions” within the period.
The restrictions relate to RBC Capital Markets policies on pre-clearance and holding periods, among others.
The private American regulator said the financial services provider contravened FINRA Rules 3110 and 2010 which demand the supervision of associated persons working for its members firms and also the maintenance of high standards in dealings.
Earlier in June, FINRA also slammed a censure order and a monetary penalty of $90,000 on RBC Capital Markets following Cboe Exchange's allegation of anticipatory hedging allegations against the company.
More Details on the New Fine
According to FINRA, RBC Capital Markets between June 2018 and February 2020 failed to put in place a reasonably designed supervisory system, including written supervisory procedures, to timely review paper statements from employees' outside accounts.
“For example, the firm had no prescribed timeframe to track, reconcile, and review statements. As a result, and due to the manual nature of the paper statement review process, personnel turnover, and outdated technology systems, as of February 2020, the firm had a backlog of approximately 8,950 unreviewed account statements, with some dating as far back as June 2018,” FINRA explained.
The review of the backlog was not completed until February 2021, FINRA said.
The financial watchdog further disclosed that RBC Capital Markets manually tracked receipt of paper statements, had no system in place to notify the firm or employees that statements were missing, and had no procedure for following up on missing statements.
“As a result, in some instances, the firm did not receive paper statements for review. For example, after the firm identified the backlog of unreviewed statements described above, it discovered that approximately 2,600 additional statements had not been mailed to the firm,” the markets supervisor said.
FINRA and Dealerweb
Meanwhile, FINRA recently slapped a $100,000 fine on Dealerweb Inc., an operator of an electronic interdealer platform for mortgage-backed securities.
Dealerweb inaccurately reported approximately 180,000 transactions in TRACE-eligible securities to the FINRA Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (TRACE) between July 2016 and December 2020, the regulator said.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

My Forex Funds Charts Path for 2025-2026 Revival After Legal Wins
My Forex Funds unveils 2025-2026 roadmap post-CFTC win: asset recovery, data analysis, and team rebuild.

Maven Trading Review: Traders Flag Funding Rule Issues, Stop-Loss Glitches & Wide Spreads
Are you facing funding issues with Maven Trading, a UK-based prop trading firm? Do you find Mavin trading rules concerning stop-loss and other aspects strange and loss-making? Does the funding program access come with higher spreads? Does the trading data offered on the Maven Trading login differ from what’s available on the popular TradingView platform? These are some specific issues concerning traders at Maven Trading. Upset by these untoward financial incidents, some traders shared complaints while sharing the Maven Trading Review. We have shared some of their complaints in this article. Take a look.

BTSE Review: Ponzi Scam, KYC Verification Hassles & Account Blocks Hit Traders Hard
Have you lost your capital with BTSE’s Ponzi scam? Did the forex broker onboard you by promising no KYC verification on both deposits and withdrawals, only to be proven wrong in real time? Have you been facing account blocks by the Virgin Islands-based forex broker? These complaints have become usual with traders at BTSE Exchange. In this BTSE review article, we have shared some of these complaints for you to look at. Read on!

Amillex Global Secures ASIC Licence for Expansion
Amillex Global gains ASIC AFSL licence, boosting FX and CFDs credibility. Expansion targets Asia, Australia, and institutional trading growth.
