RM500,000 Gone: Lecturer Duped by Online Investment Scam
A 39-year-old lecturer in Kuantan has been defrauded of RM493,600 in a sophisticated online investment scam
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Guaranty Trust Bank (UK) Limited (GT Bank) was fined £7,671,800 by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for major flaws in its anti-money laundering (AML) systems and controls between October 2014 and July 2019.

Guaranty Trust Bank (UK) Limited (GT Bank) was fined £7,671,800 by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for major flaws in its anti-money laundering (AML) systems and controls between October 2014 and July 2019.
GT Bank failed to conduct appropriate client risk assessments over the relevant period, often failing to analyze or record the money laundering threats presented by its customers.
The bank also failed to properly monitor consumer transactions and commercial interactions.
These flaws were regularly pointed up to GT Bank by internal and external sources, including the FCA, but despite this, GT Bank refused to take the necessary steps to address them.
GT Bank ceased accepting new clients in early 2018. Given the FCA's persistent concerns, GT Bank decided to impose more voluntary business limits later that year. The requirements were in force until the middle of 2021 when they were removed after the bank completed a rehabilitation plan that was reviewed by an independent third party.
GT Bank's behavior is more egregious in light of the fact that this is not the first time the bank has faced enforcement action with respect to its AML procedures, with the FCA fining the bank £525,000 in August 2013 for substantial and systematic breaches.
The FCA requires enterprises to have strong anti-money laundering (AML) measures in place to reduce the danger of people and organizations using financial institutions to bypass limitations meant to prevent them from benefiting from assets gained illegally.
GT Bank did not contest the FCA's findings and decided to settle, therefore it is eligible for a 30% reduction. The pecuniary penalty would have been £10,959,700 without the reduction.
Stay tuned for more regulatory news.
Download and install the WikiFX App from the download link below to stay updated on the latest news, even on the go. You can also download the app from the App Store or Google Play Store.
Download link: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

A 39-year-old lecturer in Kuantan has been defrauded of RM493,600 in a sophisticated online investment scam

Do you have to constantly witness trade delays on the EO Broker trading platform? Have you encountered cases of unfair trade executions where you have recorded heavy losses? Are inconsistent spreads eating into your trading gains? Is the EO Broker withdrawal process too slow? Is the customer support team incompetent in resolving all these trading queries? You are not alone! Many traders have vehemently opposed the broker’s tactics on review platforms. We have highlighted different EO Broker reviews in this article. Read on!

Achiever FX has been receiving flak for numerous reasons, including slow-paced trade execution, lack of transparency, and, importantly, alleged attempts to defraud traders. With its customer support team not able to resolve these issues, traders have allegedly been left alone! They have rightly reviewed the Saint Lucia-based forex broker negatively online. In this Achiever FX review article, we have explored complaints against the forex broker. Keep reading to know the same.

Alpari艾福瑞's notably low overall rating of 2.52 out of 10 raises immediate red flags for traders seeking a reliable forex broker. While the broker has generated sufficient market presence to accumulate 218 documented reviews, the available data presents an unusually opaque picture of their operational strengths and weaknesses. This lack of clear performance metrics across key service areas makes it challenging to provide specific insights into their trading conditions, platform reliability, or customer service quality. Read on for more information.