UbitMarkets Review 2026: No Regulation, Direct Links to UBIT Coin Scam, and Serious Platform Risks
UbitMarkets review reveals no valid license and direct links to a fraudulent project, raising serious concerns over investor fund safety.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The article discusses allegations that Binance, the largest cryptocurrency exchange, mixed customer funds with its revenue at a U.S. bank, violating financial regulations while providing statements from Binance denying the commingling accusations.

According to an inside source familiar with Binance's finances, the cryptocurrency exchange allegedly mixed its revenue with customer funds at a U.S. bank between 2020 and 2021, involving billions. It was reported that this commingling of funds frequently occurred in Binance accounts held at Silvergate Bank. While no evidence of stolen or lost client funds was found, this practice breaches the U.S. financial regulations that mandate the separation of customer money and business revenue.
Binance spokesperson Brad Jaffe denied the commingling allegations, stating that the accounts in question were used solely to facilitate user purchases of cryptocurrencies, not to accept user deposits. Jaffe clarified that the funds were corporate and not commingled with customer funds. However, Binance's website reportedly referred to customer dollar transfers as “deposits”. It stated that these deposits could be withdrawn as USD, creating the default assumption that client funds would be safeguarded like traditional cash deposits.
In a previous report, Reuters revealed that Binance had undisclosed access to a bank account held by its U.S. arm, Binance. U.S. Through this account, Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao transferred over $400 million to a trading firm named Merit Peak Limited. While Reuters couldn't independently confirm all the figures provided by the inside source, it obtained a bank record showing that Binance mingled $20 million from a corporate account with $15 million from an account dedicated to receiving customers' funds. However, there was no evidence of customer funds being lost due to this commingling.
Binance's spokesperson responded to the allegations, rejecting the findings and reaffirming that the accounts in question were not used to receive user deposits but to assist users' purchases. The spokesperson maintained that the funds were strictly corporate and denied any commingling. In response to the report, Binance's Chief Communication Officer, Patrick Hillmann, criticized Reuters on Twitter, calling the story “weak” and accusing the news agency of lacking evidence.
This latest report by Reuters comes shortly after the U.S. Commodity and Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) charged Binance with operating an illegal digital assets exchange in the U.S. The CFTC also accused CEO Changpeng Zhao of running Binance through opaque entities. Binance is already facing regulatory issues in the U.S., with previous accusations of commingling funds. Additionally, the company is being investigated by the US Justice Department for possible sanctions violations and has recently announced its exit from the Canadian market due to stricter cryptocurrency regulations. The case of Binance mixing customer and company funds parallels similar allegations made against FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, who has denied knowingly commingling funds and is currently facing fraud charges.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

UbitMarkets review reveals no valid license and direct links to a fraudulent project, raising serious concerns over investor fund safety.

Is withdrawing capital from PaxForex too difficult for traders? Has the China-based forex broker made you trade gold, silver and cryptocurrencies despite not having an office in the United States? Do you find its operational style suspicious? You are not alone! Several traders have expressed these concerns when trading with the broker. In this PaxForex review article, we have exposed the broker through user comments made on several review platforms. Take a look!

When traders ask, "Is OneRoyal legit or a scam?" The answer isn't simply yes or no. OneRoyal is a trading company that has been running for almost twenty years and has important licenses from top financial authorities. This background puts it far away from typical quick scam operations. However, questions about whether it's trustworthy are reasonable and often come from its complicated business structure, the use of overseas companies, and a pattern of specific, serious complaints from users. This article aims to go beyond marketing claims and provide a fact-based analysis of OneRoyal's trustworthiness.

Crypto exchange Bybit will limit access for Japanese users in 2025, citing compliance with strict local regulations.