简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:FINRA levies $24 million fine against BofA Securities for alleged spoofing and supervisory failures, unveiling ongoing regulatory scrutiny across financial markets.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has taken action against BofA Securities, imposing a significant fine of $24 million. This penalty comes as a result of the firm's alleged involvement in more than 700 instances of spoofing and associated supervisory shortcomings within the US Treasury secondary markets, spanning over a six-year period.
Spoofing, a practice involving deceptive orders to fabricate market activity, was reportedly employed by BofA Securities through two former traders in the US Treasury secondary markets from October 2014 to February 2021. The firm stands accused of engaging in 717 instances of spoofing during this time.
The Executive Vice President and Head of Enforcement at FINRA, Bill St. Louis, expressed concern, highlighting that spoofing undermines market transparency and integrity by distorting actual supply and demand. He emphasized that this action underscores FINRA's commitment to vigorously pursue firms involved in spoofing, including cross-product spoofing.
Throughout this duration, BofA Securities failed to establish and sustain a supervisory system capable of detecting spoofing activities in the US Treasury markets. Although a system was implemented by the company in November 2015, it remained inadequate until mid-2019, primarily detecting algorithmic spoofing and not manual manipulation by traders.

While BofA Securities has accepted FINRA's findings without admitting or denying the charges, it's worth noting that the company was previously fined $325,000 last year by FINRA for allegedly issuing inaccurate monthly reports for order execution.
The regulatory body disclosed that between January 2014 and February 2022, BofA Securities incorrectly reported order execution statistics for its two market centres, MLCO and MLIX. The company reportedly disregarded the requirement to present separate statistical information under Rule 605, leading to combined reports for both centres being published.
In a separate incident, Credit Suisse faced scrutiny when FINRA fined its US subsidiary $900,000 for deficiencies in regulatory reporting. The violations involved tardy trades and inaccurate reports from November 2015 to March 2023 on the Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine.
Earlier this year, Webull was subject to a $3 million penalty by FINRA. The focus was on the firm's oversight in onboarding options traders and the absence of adequate supervisory systems to identify and address customer complaints. This oversight led to the approval of roughly 9,000 unqualified traders, including more than 2,500 customers under 21 without the required options trading experience.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Are your profits through the Stockity platform vanishing suspiciously? Does the forex broker allow you to withdraw only your initial deposit? Do you face illegitimate login issues on Stockity? Have you witnessed unexplained fund losses while trading binary options on Stockity? Traders report these unfavorable experiences on online review platforms. These experiences indicate a potential scam from this Marshall Islands-based forex broker. In this article, we have highlighted trader reviews of Stockity. Keep reading!

Malaysia’s Securities Commission warns that complaints about unlicensed investment activities have doubled in five years—3,602 cases in 2024 and 2,039 in H1 2025—highlighting increasingly sophisticated scams targeting even professionals and seniors. Schemes often mimic legitimacy, then block withdrawals via “compliance” or “maintenance” excuses. The core defense is pre-investment verification and ongoing risk control.

The UK’s financial organization, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), has issued warnings against many unauthorized brokers. The FCA exposes those firms operating illegally on a daily basis through its FCA Daily Alerts. Checkout full FCA warning list below. This list includes firms to avoid, helping ensure that your money is protected.

While technical indicators or chart patterns often capture the attention of forex traders, especially new ones, aspects such as margin requirements, equity, used margin, free margin, and margin levels are often overlooked. So, if you have received a margin call from your forex broker and are wondering how to deal with it, you probably do not know the concept of a forex margin call - what triggers it and how to avoid it. Being unaware of this concept can make you lose your hard-earned capital. In this article, we will provide you with all the information you need to know. Keep reading!