简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Five Brokers Linked to $525M Fraud Scheme Are Under SEC's Radar
Abstract:The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed charges against nine entities, including five individuals, for an alleged multimillion-dollar fraud scheme linked to pre-IPO investments, drawing in over 4,000 global investors.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has brought charges against five individuals and four entities allegedly involved in a substantial fraud scheme related to pre-initial public offering (IPO) investments. Among the accused are Raymond J. Pirrello, Jr., Marcello Follano, Robert Cassino, Anthony DiTucci, Joseph Rivera, and their respective companies. These defendants are believed to have engaged in deceptive practices that led to over $525 million in unregistered offerings.
These investments drew in more than 4,000 individuals globally, enticing them with promises of no upfront fees while covertly imposing undisclosed markups. This scheme resulted in illicit profits exceeding $88 million for the defendants and their associates.
As per the complaint, Sheldon Pollock, serving as the Associate Regional Director in the New York Regional Office, highlighted that the defendants allegedly marketed unregistered securities to investors, claiming no upfront fees while purportedly channelling tens of millions through undisclosed fees for their own gain.
The accused allegedly established an extensive network of unregistered sales agents who misled investors by falsely asserting the absence of upfront fees. In reality, investors faced substantial undisclosed markups, reaching as high as 150 percent, benefiting the defendants and their sales agents.
The individuals accused supposedly concealed Raymond J. Pirrello Jr.'s involvement, concealing his past SEC sanctions related to insider trading. The SEC's complaint, filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York, levied multiple violations of antifraud, securities, and broker-dealer registration laws against the defendants. The SEC seeks a permanent injunction, restitution of ill-gotten gains, and civil penalties.

In recent times, the SEC has intensified its pursuit of companies failing to register with the agency. In the previous month, the regulator initiated legal action against Kraken, a San Francisco-based crypto exchange, for allegedly operating unregistered services, encompassing securities exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency activities.
The charges involve claims of commingling customers funds and crypto assets with Kraken's own, echoing accusations against Binance and Coinbase. The SEC alleges Kraken operated as an exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency without the necessary registrations.
Kraken responded by denying accusations of fraud or market manipulation, asserting that none of the alleged funds were missing or misused. However, while Kraken did not dispute the allegation of commingling funds, it clarified that the SEC did not claim any missing or misused customer funds.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

InterTrader Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Account Blocks, Profit Removal & Additional Fee for Withd
Does InterTrader block your forex trading account, giving inexplicable reasons? Does the broker flag you with latency trading and cancel all your profits? Do you have to pay additional fees for withdrawals? Did the UK-based forex broker fail to recognize the deposit you made? Does the customer service fail to address your trading queries? In this InterTrader review article, we have shared such complaints. Read them out.

Grand Capital Doesn’t Feel GRAND for Traders with Withdrawal Denials & Long Processing Times
The trading environment does not seem that rosy for traders at Grand Capital, a Seychelles-based forex broker. Traders’ requests for withdrawals are alleged to be in the review process for months, making them frustrated and helpless. Despite meeting the guidelines, traders find it hard to withdraw funds, as suggested by their complaints online. What’s also troubling traders are long processing times concerning Grand Capital withdrawals. In this Grand Capital review segment, we have shared some complaints for you to look at. Read on!

EmiraX Markets Withdrawal Issues Exposed
EmiraX Markets Review reveals unregulated status, fake license claims, and withdrawal issues. Stay safe and avoid this broker.

ADSS Review: Traders Say NO to Trading B’coz of Withdrawal Blocks, Account Freeze & Trade Issues
Does ADSS give you plenty of excuses to deny you access to withdrawals? Is your withdrawal request pending for months or years? Do you witness account freezes from the United Arab Emirates-based forex broker? Do you struggle to open and close your forex positions on the ADSS app? Does the customer support service fail to respond to your trading queries? All these issues have become a rage online. In this ADSS Broker review article, we have highlighted actual trader wordings on these issues. Keep reading!
