Is DB Investing Regulation Safe for Traders?
DB Investing regulation is offshore under Seychelles FSA, offering oversight but limited protection, with reported withdrawal risks for traders.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The National Audit Office, Britain's overseer of public spending, has criticized the Financial Conduct Authority's sluggishness in enforcing actions, particularly citing its approach toward crypto firms across a span of years.

The National Audit Office (NAO), Britain's overseer of public spending, has highlighted the Financial Conduct Authority's sluggishness in enforcing actions, particularly citing its approach toward crypto firms across a span of years.
The United States recently made waves with a noteworthy $4 billion settlement involving Binance, the world's largest crypto exchange, whereas the United Kingdom's progression has been notably more measured in comparison. According to a report released on Friday by the National Audit Office (NAO), the FCA's enforcement actions exhibit considerable delays even when issues fall within its jurisdiction.
Highlighting the FCA's handling of crypto firms, the report emphasizes the prolonged timelines for the FCA to initiate enforcement actions, even when well within its authority. Despite the FCA's directive from January 2020 requiring crypto firms to register, it wasn't until February 2023 that the regulator began enforcing actions against illegal operators of crypto ATMs, following its supervision efforts and engagements with unregistered firms.

The report cites the FCA's public disclosure stating a substantial 68% decline in reported crypto ATM activities in 2022, albeit attributing this drop partially to the FCA's actions. However, the regulator has faced ongoing criticism from the crypto industry due to sluggish processing of registration applications. The FCA has attributed this delayed pace to challenges in staff retention, particularly in acquiring and maintaining employees possessing specialized skills in crypto compliance.
The Head of NAO, Gareth Davies, emphasized that the FCA is experiencing substantial reform, reacting to shifts in the financial services regulatory framework and implementing operational adjustments aimed at enhancing performance.
Investing £317m in its transformation program from 2020 to 2023, the FCA increased its staff by 16%, particularly focusing on recruiting specialized skills, notably in the crypto sector, facing registration and enforcement challenges due to skill shortages.
Davies highlighted that it is imperative for the FCA to optimize its utilization of data, evaluating its intended outcomes and resource allocation to achieve maximum impact.
Bolstering data management capabilities through a data lake upgrade and improved tools for information access and analytics, the FCA aims to reduce data risks and enhance operational efficiency.
The NAO recommends refining operational processes, engaging stakeholders for evaluating new accountability arrangements' effectiveness, providing clearer performance metrics, and devising a long-term workforce plan.
The FSMA 2023 significantly broadened the FCA's rule-making authority, bringing it under closer Parliamentary scrutiny. Establishing new independent accountability mechanisms is a key mandate for the FCA, expected to be in place by 2024.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

DB Investing regulation is offshore under Seychelles FSA, offering oversight but limited protection, with reported withdrawal risks for traders.

ehamarkets is the focus of many traders on broker review platforms for all the negative reasons. Among the many complaints against the Malaysia-based forex broker, the withdrawal issue and the utter helplessness of the trader in recovering their funds stood out. The broker is accused of denying traders their funds using numerous excuses. So, if you were planning to invest in this forex broker, do not miss reading this ehamarkets review article. Take a look!

Witnessed a complete halt on your Bull Market trading platform after a good run? Did you receive a poor response from the broker’s official upon the trading halt enquiry? Failed to receive withdrawals despite undergoing numerous checks by the forex broker? Is your Bull Market withdrawal application pending for months? Did you have to encounter massive trading fees on the Bull Market platform? These issues have become rampant here, and we have highlighted them in this Bull Market review article.

Earned profits on the BitForex platform, but could not withdraw because of tax payment and other liabilities? Does the forex broker even flag your account with fake money laundering charges? Do you consistently face login issues when using the BitForex trading platform? Is your deposited capital directed to the wrong address by the forex broker? All these have become very typical of the way the broker goes about the business. Many traders have opposed the broker on several review platforms online. It’s time to check their comments in this BitForex review article.