简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
CFTC Triumphs in Forex Fraud Battles Against Oasis and Highrise Scammers
Abstract:CFTC Triumphs Over Oasis and Highrise Forex Scammers | $80M & $102M Verdicts - Protecting Investors in Forex Marke

Recent considerable judgments and penalties obtained by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in two significant cases represent a resounding victory over fraudulent activities in the retail foreign exchange market. By highlighting the risks associated with transacting with unregistered entities in the foreign exchange and commodity pool markets, these cases underscore the criticality of investor protection.
Oasis Scam by Michael DaCorta: An $80 Million Deception
Under the supervision of Judge Virginia Covington of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the initial case pertained to Michael DaCorta, a resident of Florida who was convicted of masterminding a significant retail foreign exchange fraud scheme. Satellite Holdings Company (SHC), Oasis International Group, Limited (OIG), and DaCorta were all found to have committed numerous infractions of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations.

According to the summary judgment order, DaCorta and his associates deceived around 800 victims into transferring more than $80 million to OIG, OM, and SHC to finance, margin, or leverage retail foreign currency transactions. In addition to civil monetary penalties and restitution exceeding $61 million, the court ordered DaCorta to make these payments, thereby emphasizing the gravity of his conduct and acting as a deterrent against future occurrences of the same.
Consent orders were also issued against several Florida and out-of-state residents who were implicated in the scheme. The individuals who participated in the fraudulent activities were imposed significant financial obligations in the form of restitution and penalties. The court's decisions unveiled a disconcerting trend of misappropriation and deceit, whereby funds intended for foreign exchange trading were misappropriated and spent on extravagant personal items, such as luxury automobiles and residences.
Avinash Singh's Highrise: A Verdict of $102 Million
In the second case, which was also heard in the Middle District of Florida and was presided over by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza, Highrise Advantage, LLC and Avinash Singh were indicted. Singh and Highrise were convicted in a default judgment of fraudulent solicitation and misappropriation of funds via a master commodity pool and four feeder pools. The judgment imposed restitution and penalties totaling more than $102 million, which reflected the severe damage caused to investors.

The Highrise scheme was marked by improper use of investor funds and deceit. Notwithstanding the collection of nearly $58 million, forex trading was allocated a negligible portion, less than $2.5 million. The majority of the funds were misappropriated or utilized for Ponzi scheme disbursements. Investors were deceived through the dissemination of inaccurate information, which simulated profitability where none existed.
Singh was confronted with further criminal allegations, which encompassed wire fraud and money laundering, thereby underscoring the seriousness of his deeds. To ensure the protection of its clients, the CFTC issued a warning that repayment orders might not consistently yield the retrieval of funds due to the potential insolvency of the wrongdoers. Despite this, the CFTC maintains an unwavering commitment to ensuring justice and accountability.
Ongoing CFTC Initiatives to Safeguard Investors
To safeguard investors and counter financial deception, the CFTC has issued advisories to enlighten the general public on how to recognize and prevent such schemes. Individuals are advised by the agency to confirm the registration status of businesses with the CFTC before transferring funds to them. These endeavors are components of a more extensive scheme aimed at protecting investors against fraudulent operations in the foreign exchange and commodity pools.

When contemplating investments in these markets, due diligence is more than ever demonstrated by these two instances. Investors must exercise prudence, conduct comprehensive research on prospective investment opportunities, and verify the legitimacy of the entities with which they conduct business. By maintaining a state of constant awareness and awareness of developments, individuals can decrease their susceptibility to fraud and fraudulent schemes.
Successful outcomes for the CFTC in these cases demonstrate unequivocally that fraudulent activities will not be tolerated in the retail currency market. Asserting accountability for those who violate the integrity of these markets, the agency maintains its steadfast dedication to its mission. Investors can have confidence that their interests are being protected against unscrupulous entities and individuals while the CFTC maintains its vigilance.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Neotrades Review: Traders Claim Profit Cuts, False Assurances & Unfair Terms
Do you feel constant pressure from Neotrades to deposit your forex capital? Were you given a false assurance by the broker on recovering your trade losses? Have all your profits been wiped to ZERO on the Neotrades login? Does the Mauritius-based forex broker apply stringent terms and conditions for profit withdrawals? In this Neotrades review article, we have showcased these complaints. Read them below.

Thailand Strikes Back: Online Scam Losses Plunge ฿195M+
Thailand’s Anti-Cyber Scam Centre (ACSC) reported 392 fewer online scam cases and a 31.4% week-on-week drop in losses—over ฿195 million saved—driven by police suppression and public awareness. Authorities caution that syndicates are relocating and exploiting events (e.g., southern floods). While online purchase fraud remains most common, “reward transfer” scams now cause the highest losses, surpassing investment scams.

FXFlat Exposed: Traders Report Withdrawal Issues, High Slippage & Poor Customer Support Service
Making profits, but FXFlat is cancelling all of them? Do you constantly face losses due to slippage by the Germany-based forex broker? Is your forex trading account getting deactivated after making the FXFlat withdrawal request? Do you have to constantly deal with poor customer support issues? You are not alone! Many traders have openly expressed their frustration over these issues online. In this FXFlat review article, we have shared some of their complaints. Read on!

When the Licence Disappears: What Traders Overlook About Their Brokers
In the foreign exchange and online trading industries, regulation is often referred to as a technical requirement. Yet for traders of all levels, a broker’s regulatory status is one of the most fundamental markers of safety and transparency. When a broker loses its licence, it is never a minor administrative event. It signals structural problems that can place client funds and trading conditions at significant risk. Understanding why brokers lose their licences, what it means, and how traders can stay informed is essential in today’s rapidly shifting financial landscape.
