简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Belgian Financial Watchdog Cautions Against Proprietary Trading Risks
Abstract:US proprietary trading sector faces setback. MetaQuotes revokes licenses, forcing firms to halt new registrations. Uncertain future looms. Belgian FSMA warns traders of risks. Traders face challenges in costly training. Some never pass, firms profit. FSMA notes use of demo accounts for commissions, terms unclear. FSMA cautions against trading, urges scrutiny of associated ecosystems. Proprietary firms not authorized for financial services. Heed FSMA warning for safer trading.

A significant setback has just occurred for the US proprietary trading sector. A major participant in the trading platform industry, MetaQuotes, created a stir last month when it revoked licenses from many proprietary trading companies. Affected organizations are struggling to come up with other solutions in the wake of this abrupt action, which has forced them to pause new customer registrations while they look for workable alternatives. Even though some companies have switched trading platforms, the industry's future is uncertain.
The Belgian Financial Services and Markets Authority's (FSMA) website issues a warning. The FSMA has warned traders to be wary of proprietary trading companies. These businesses are experts at luring people into trading, sometimes focusing specifically on intricate financial products like Forex and Contracts for Difference (CFDs). Regulatory agencies like the FSMA have taken notice of this precise emphasis.
A trader's path to success is not easy, as the Financial Services and Market Association (FSMA) claims. These businesses need costly, time-consuming, and a lot of training. It is a requirement for traders to take these courses and pay the associated fees. Nevertheless, despite their best efforts, some dealers may not be able to get past these barriers, leaving them empty-handed. Regrettably, these companies continue to profit from the encounter.

Furthermore, the Financial Services and Market Association (FSMA) has drawn attention to situations where certified traders choose to forgo live trading using the company's demo accounts. Traders may only be eligible for commissions after demonstrating profitability in these virtual settings. But since proprietary trading organizations' terms are so ambiguous, it's sometimes impossible for customers to determine how much they may potentially earn in commissions.
Alongside this trend—which has corresponded with an increase in consumer inquiries—the FSMA has also seen the increased visibility of proprietary trading company marketing across different social media platforms. The fact that some of these businesses even charge for courses designed to help people pass the necessary exams raises concerns about the industry's accessibility and openness.
The FSMA has strongly cautioned against proprietary trading in light of these increased risks. It has also advised consumers to exercise caution while examining associated ecosystems, such as training programs and trading platforms. The allure of the game elements included in these transactions poses a risk as it may push clients to behave hastily and irresponsibly.
The Financial Services and Market Authority (FSMA) has stressed that proprietary trading firms cannot offer financial services. The FSMA stresses that clients must research these firms before doing business with them.
Therefore, the warning from the FSMA serves as a clear reminder of the possible risks associated with the world of proprietary trading. Traders may traverse this complicated terrain with more assurance and awareness by following this advice to the letter and being watchful.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

KKR Exposed: Traders Allege Fund Scams, Withdrawal Denials & Regulatory Concerns
Do you witness a negative trading account balance on the KKR broker login? Does the broker prevent you from withdrawing your funds after making profits? Do you need to pay an extra margin for withdrawals? These trading issues have become common for traders at KKR. In this KKR broker review article, we have elaborated on the complaints. Take a look!

IG Launches 5% Cashback Offer for New UK Customers
IG cashback offer UK 2025 gives investors up to £100 back. Compare the best UK investment platforms with cashback today.

In-Depth Review of MH Markets Regulation and Compliance Profile – What Traders Should Really Know
This in-depth analysis provides a data-driven examination of the MH Markets regulation and compliance profile. Drawing primarily on verified data from the global broker inquiry app WikiFX, supplemented by public records, we will dissect the broker's multi-jurisdictional licensing, evaluate the real-world protections offered to traders, and interpret the warnings and ratings that define its standing in the competitive forex and CFD landscape.

In-Depth Stonefort Securities Commission Fees and Spreads Analysis for 2025
This comprehensive Stonefort Securities commission fees and spreads analysis aims to cut through the noise. We will dissect the broker's complete cost structure, from the spreads on its Elite account to its commission policies and the potential for hidden non-trading fees. Explore more.
