简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
UK FCA Bans and Fines James Lewis, £120,300 for Misleading Investors
Abstract:Former CEO of Shard Capital Partners, James Lewis, was fined £120,300 and banned for providing incorrect client account information.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has imposed a £120,300 fine and a suspension from the financial services industry on former Shard Capital Partners CEO James Lewis. Following two separate occasions in which Lewis was found to have provided deceptive information regarding client funds, the regulatory body initiated these measures.

Lewis misled auditors from May 2017 to June 2015 by asserting that Shard had significant financial reserves on behalf of a particular client. An additional client of the same group owed these funds. In addition to distorting the financial situation, his conduct compromised the market's integrity.
Lewis misinformed another client between June and July 2021 that Shard was securely guarding substantial quantities of money, thereby perpetuating the problems. Lewis, nevertheless, chose to conceal the fact that these funds had been previously transmitted from the client's account.
The misrepresentations made by Lewis were not isolated errors. On both occasions, he had actual knowledge that the erroneous information would be integrated into the client's annual financial statements, leading to significant discrepancies in the reported accounts.

Steve Smart, the FCA's joint executive director of enforcement and market oversight, stated, “Mr. Lewis failed miserably to meet the elevated benchmarks of expertise, diligence, and ethical conduct that we hold in high regard for all individuals entrusted with the leadership of financial institutions.” Smart underscored the paramount importance of precise information in preserving investor confidence and emphasized the substantial financial repercussions that could result from Lewis's conduct.
The FCA discovered these deceptive practices during its investigation into the initial instance of misinformation. During this examination in September 2023, Shard discovered the future misleading activity and promptly contacted the FCA. Lewis himself subsequently notified the regulatory body of his actions.
The FCA's stringent measure serves to highlight how important honesty and transparency are in the financial services industry. It effectively reminds individuals in leadership roles to maintain the utmost levels of integrity. The restriction against Lewis participating in regulated financial operations protects investors' interests and maintains the integrity of financial markets.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Seacrest Markets Exposed: Are You Facing Payout Denials and Spread Issues with This Prop Firm?
Seacrest Markets has garnered wrath from traders owing to a variety of reasons, including payout denials for traders winning trading challenges, high slippage causing losses, the lack of response from the customer support official to address withdrawal issues, and more. Irritated by these trading inefficiencies, a lot of traders have given a negative review of Seacrest Markets prop firm. In this article, we have shared some of them. Take a look!

GKFX Review: Are Traders Facing Slippage and Account Freeze Issues?
Witnessing capital losses despite tall investment return assurances by GKFX officials? Do these officials sound too difficult for you to judge, whether they offer real or fake advice? Do you encounter slippage issues causing a profit reduction on the GKFX login? Is account freezing usual at GKFX? Does the United Kingdom-based forex broker prevent you from accessing withdrawals? You are not alone! In this GKFX review guide, we have shared the complaints. Take a look!

Is Seaprimecapitals Regulated? A Complete Look at Its Safety and How It Works
The straightforward answer to this important question is no. Seaprimecapitals works as a broker without proper regulation. This fact is the most important thing any trader needs to know, because it creates serious risks for your capital and how safely the company operates. While this broker offers some good features, like the popular MetaTrader 5 platform and a low starting deposit, these benefits cannot make up for the major risks that come from having no real financial supervision. This article will give you a detailed, fact-based look at Seaprimecapitals regulation, what the company claims to do, the services it provides, and the clear differences between official information and user reviews. Our purpose is to give you the information you need to make a smart decision about the risks and benefits of working with this company.

Major Complaints of MUFG Broker in 2025 You Shouldn’t Ignore
2025 is about to end, and if you still want to be a trader or investor and are looking for a broker to invest with. It is important to read real user complaints first. This will help you understand the kind of problems users are facing with MUFG broker. In this article, we will tell you about the major complaints users have reported about MUFG in 2025, so you know what to watch out for. Do not ignore this MUFG broker article and understand the problems.
