Doctor loses RM880,000 in fake share investment scam
A doctor in Pahang lost over RM880,000 in a fake share scheme promising high returns
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:India’s banking sector is grappling with a significant cybersecurity crisis as a ransomware attack has forced nearly 300 small banks offline, according to a report by Reuters. The attack has severely disrupted transaction processing among the affected lenders, highlighting vulnerabilities within the country's financial system.

Indias banking sector is grappling with a significant cybersecurity crisis as a ransomware attack has forced nearly 300 small banks offline, according to a report by Reuters. The attack has severely disrupted transaction processing among the affected lenders, highlighting vulnerabilities within the country's financial system.
The Extent of the Disruption
The ransomware attack primarily targeted C-Edge Technologies, a crucial provider of banking technology to many of Indias smaller financial institutions. As a result, these banks have been cut off from the National Payment Corporation of India (NPCI) system, hampering their ability to process payments.
In a swift response to contain the attack, NPCI issued a public advisory on Wednesday. The advisory noted that NPCI had temporarily isolated C-Edge Technologies from accessing the retail payments system to prevent the ransomware from spreading further within the payment network.
Minimal Impact on the National Scale
Despite the considerable disruption for the affected banks, the overall impact on Indias payment system remains minimal. Regulatory officials have clarified that the banks impacted by the ransomware attack represent only about 0.5% of the country's total payment system volumes. India boasts approximately 1,500 cooperative and regional banks, predominantly operating outside major metropolitan areas. The institutions affected by this attack are a small subset of these banks.
Ongoing Security Measures and Audits
In response to the attack, NPCI is conducting a comprehensive audit to ensure the ransomware does not spread further. This proactive measure aims to safeguard the broader payment system's integrity. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and Indian cyber authorities have recently heightened their warnings to banks regarding the escalating risk of cyberattacks.
However, both C-Edge Technologies and the RBI have remained silent on the issue, not responding to requests for comments. This lack of communication has exacerbated concerns and uncertainty among the affected banks and their customers.
Broader Implications and Historical Context
This ransomware attack underscores a growing trend in cyber threats against the financial industry. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), over the past two decades, the financial industry has lost $12 billion due to more than 20,000 cyberattacks. This surge in cybersecurity incidents is attributed to the rapid digitalization of financial services and escalating geopolitical tensions.
The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated the situation, with the number of cyberattacks on financial firms doubling. The direct losses incurred by companies in the sector have more than quadrupled since 2017, reaching $2.5 billion.
Conclusion
The ransomware attack on India's small banks serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities within the financial system. While the immediate impact on the national payment infrastructure remains limited, the incident highlights the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures and enhanced preparedness to mitigate future threats. As digitalization continues to transform the banking sector, ensuring the security and resilience of financial institutions against cyber threats becomes increasingly paramount.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

A doctor in Pahang lost over RM880,000 in a fake share scheme promising high returns

FIBO Group has grabbed attention from traders for mostly the wrong reasons, as traders have accused the broker of causing financial losses using malicious tactics. Whether it is about withdrawal access, deposit disappearance, trade manipulation, or awful customer support service, the broker is receiving flak from traders on all aspects online. Our team accumulated a list of complaints against the FIBO Group broker. Let’s screen these with us in this FIBO Group review article.

Do you have to pay taxes or margin when seeking fund withdrawals from GMO-Z.com, a Thailand-based forex broker? Do you witness heavy slippage when trading on the broker’s platform? These are some complaints traders have made against the broker. In this GMO-Z.com review article, we have explained these complaints. Take a look!

WikiFX has launched the “Inside the Elite” Interview Series, featuring outstanding members of the newly formed Elite Committee. During the committee’s first offline gathering in Dubai, we conducted exclusive interviews and gained deeper insights into regional market dynamics and industry developments. Through this series, WikiFX aims to highlight the voices of professionals who are shaping the future of forex trading — from education and compliance to risk control, technology, and trader empowerment.