简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
FINRA Fines Investment Network and CEO for Misconduct in Pre-IPO Offerings
Abstract:The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has imposed significant fines on Investment Network, Inc. (INI) and its CEO, Gary L. Arnold, for a series of regulatory violations connected to the sale of pre-initial public offering (pre-IPO) funds between October 2020 and May 2021.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has imposed significant fines on Investment Network, Inc. (INI) and its CEO, Gary L. Arnold, for a series of regulatory violations connected to the sale of pre-initial public offering (pre-IPO) funds between October 2020 and May 2021.
Deceptive Business Practices
INI misled investors about its compensation structure, falsely claiming it would only receive a 10% sales commission for its involvement in the private placement offerings. However, INI had secretly agreed to an additional 5% in selling compensation and half of the carried interest from the offerings. This hidden compensation agreement, which was never disclosed to investors, constituted a violation of FINRA Rule 2010 and Section 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Failure to Meet Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) Requirements
INI also willfully violated Reg BI by failing to meet the standards set forth in its Disclosure and Care Obligations. The firm did not ensure that the offerings were in the best interests of its customers, failing to confirm the existence of pre-IPO shares and the reasonableness of the issuers prices. This negligence violated Exchange Act Rule 15l-1 and FINRA Rule 2010.
Lack of Due Diligence and Supervision
In addition to the deceptive practices, INI failed to establish a reasonable supervisory system to ensure compliance with regulatory obligations. INI and its CEO did not enforce proper written supervisory procedures (WSPs) for private placement offerings. This led to further violations of Reg BIs Compliance Obligation and FINRA Rules 3110 and 2010.
Customer Identification and Filing Failures
INIs violations extended to failures under the Bank Secrecy Act, as the firm lacked an adequate Customer Identification Program (CIP) when opening accounts for the offerings. Furthermore, the company failed to file necessary documentation with FINRA, violating FINRA Rules 3310(b), 5123, and 2010.
Conclusion
FINRAs action against Investment Network and Gary L. Arnold underscores the importance of transparency, due diligence, and adherence to regulatory standards in the financial industry. By failing to disclose compensation agreements, conduct proper due diligence, and establish a supervisory system, INI and its CEO breached their obligations to both investors and regulators, leading to substantial fines and penalties. These violations serve as a reminder that firms must prioritize the best interests of their clients and maintain strong compliance programs to avoid legal and regulatory consequences.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

ITB Review: Top Reasons Why Traders Say NO to This Trading Platform
Finding it hard to withdraw profits from the ITB forex trading platform? Complying with the ITB no deposit bonus norms, but finding a NIL forex trading account balance upon withdrawal? Contacting the broker’s support officials, but not receiving any help from them? You are not alone! There are many such complaints against the Saint Lucia-based forex broker. In this ITB broker review article, we have highlighted some of these complaints. Take a look!

Scam Alert: 8,500 People Duped with Fake 8% Monthly Return Promises from Forex and Stock Investments
In a major revelation, the Economic Intelligence Unit of the Police Economic Offices Wing (EOW) is overseeing a cheating case where around 8,500 people were scammed in the name of 7-8% monthly return promises from forex and stock investments. While inquiring about the investment scheme, the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Surat, confiscated illegal cash worth INR 1.33 crore, foreign currency worth INR 3 lakh, and digital proof related to fraudulent transactions.

Long Position vs Short Position in Forex Trading: Know the Differences
When investing through forex, you often come across terms such as long position and short position. You may wonder what these two mean and how they impact your trading experience. So, the key lies in understanding the very crux of this forex trading aspect, as one wrong step can put you behind in your trading journey. Keeping these things in mind, we have prepared a guide to long position vs short position forex trading. Keep reading!

RM1.3Mil Gone in Days: JB Kinder Boss Falls for Online “Investment”
A Johor Baru kindergarten owner lost her life savings of RM1.3 million to a non-existent online investment scheme after responding to a social media ad promising returns of up to 41%. Between Nov 6–21, she made multiple transfers to several accounts and was later pressured to “add funds” to release profits that never materialised. She lodged a police report on Nov 28; the case is being probed under Section 420 (cheating).
