World Cup Fever Is Here! Choose your broker like you choose your team
Join WikiFX and investors worldwide in celebrating the excitement of the 2026 FIFA World Cup!
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) has officially withdrawn the Cyprus Investment Firm (CIF) licence of Arumpro Capital Ltd. The decision was finalised during a CySEC meeting on 11 November 2024, marking another chapter in the firm's ongoing regulatory challenges.

In a significant regulatory development, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) has officially withdrawn the Cyprus Investment Firm (CIF) licence of Arumpro Capital Ltd. The decision was finalised during a CySEC meeting on 11 November 2024, marking another chapter in the firm's ongoing regulatory challenges.
The withdrawal of the licence is in accordance with section 8(1)(a) of the Investment Services and Activities and Regulated Markets Law of 2017, as well as section 4(7) of the Directive DI87-05. According to CySEC, the firm voluntarily renounced its authorisation, prompting the regulatory body to act in compliance with established legal procedures.
This announcement comes nearly three years after Arumpro Capital Ltd faced scrutiny in the United Kingdom. In January 2022, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) revoked the firm‘s Part 4A permission, effectively prohibiting it from conducting regulated activities in the UK. The FCA’s decision followed Arumpros failure to address multiple requests for essential information, particularly those outlined in the Temporary Permissions Regime (TPR) Attestation Survey.
The FCA‘s investigation revealed critical shortcomings in Arumpro’s operations. The firm was found to be in breach of the suitability and effective supervision Threshold Conditions. The UK regulator concluded that Arumpro did not meet the criteria to be considered “fit and proper” and lacked the necessary framework for effective supervision. These findings raised serious concerns about the firm's ability to maintain the standards required of entities operating in regulated markets.

The renouncement of its CIF licence by Arumpro further underscores its regulatory struggles. Voluntary licence withdrawals are not uncommon in cases where firms face mounting compliance pressures or operational challenges that hinder their ability to adhere to regulatory requirements. By surrendering its authorisation, Arumpro has effectively ceased its operations as a regulated entity in Cyprus, a jurisdiction known for its stringent oversight of financial services providers.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Join WikiFX and investors worldwide in celebrating the excitement of the 2026 FIFA World Cup!

Have you experienced issues with Pepperstone deposit & withdrawal processing? From your experience, do you feel that the Australia-based forex broker causes losses to its clients? Did the brokerage entity freeze your account and give you a margin call? All these trading allegations have been rampant on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. This Pepperstone review article takes a close look at the user complaints, especially in 2026. Additionally, we have given an overview of the regulatory framework under which the brokerage entity operates.

Some broker comparisons end with a confident "go with this one." This is not one of them — and that honesty is exactly what makes it worth reading. Wundersys and tradgrip are two young, offshore-registered brokers that keep popping up in front of beginner traders, often through aggressive online marketing. Both promise the usual buffet: tight spreads, generous leverage, multiple account tiers. And both, according to WikiFX, sit near the very bottom of the safety scale. So instead of crowning a champion, this comparison is really about something more useful: learning to read the warning signs, understanding the small differences that still matter, and knowing why "the better of two risky options" is still a conversation about risk.

If you trade forex from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, or Nepal, you already know the quiet truth that eats into every trader's results: it is not just the market that decides whether you profit — it is the cost of getting in and out of each trade. Shave a couple of dollars off your commission on every lot, multiply it across hundreds of trades a year, and you are looking at the difference between a strategy that works and one that bleeds out slowly. South Asian traders are some of the most cost-conscious in the world, and rightly so. So we pulled the data on the brokers most often recommended for the region, cross-checked every name on WikiFX, and ranked them by the one number that matters most here: what they actually charge you to trade. Before the list, one quick lesson that will make this whole ranking click.