简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Barclays Resolves £40M Fine Over 2008 Fundraising Disclosure Failures
Abstract:Barclays has reached a settlement with the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), agreeing to pay a £40 million fine for failing to adequately disclose arrangements with Qatari investors during its critical fundraising efforts amidst the 2008 financial crisis.

Barclays has reached a settlement with the UKs Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), agreeing to pay a £40 million fine for failing to adequately disclose arrangements with Qatari investors during its critical fundraising efforts amidst the 2008 financial crisis. This agreement marks the conclusion of a protracted regulatory investigation that began in 2013.
The case revolved around undisclosed payments totalling £322 million made by Barclays to Qatari entities through two advisory agreements. These payments were directly linked to Qatari participation in the banks June and October 2008 capital raisings and effectively increased the costs associated with their involvement. The FCA highlighted that this lack of transparency deprived investors of crucial information regarding these financial arrangements.
Regulators initially proposed a £50 million penalty, but the fine was reduced after Barclays withdrew its appeal to the Upper Tribunal. The FCAs enforcement and market oversight joint executive director, Steve Smart, emphasised the gravity of the misconduct, noting its impact on investors who were not provided with all relevant details at the time. However, he acknowledged that the events occurred 16 years ago and that Barclays has since undergone significant organisational changes to improve its practices.

This regulatory resolution comes on the heels of the collapse of a separate criminal case brought by the UKs Serious Fraud Office (SFO) against Barclays and several former executives. The SFO had conducted a five-year investigation into the roles of former Chief Executive John Varley, ex-Middle East investment banking chairman Roger Jenkins, and others. However, the charges did not result in convictions.
In its official statement, Barclays confirmed that it had agreed with the FCA to withdraw its appeals against the regulator‘s findings. The bank reiterated that none of its current board members or senior management were involved in the incidents outlined in the FCA’s notices. The statement also highlighted the substantial improvements made to the banks systems and controls in the years since the 2008 fundraising efforts.
Barclays noted that while it does not accept the FCAs findings, it has chosen to conclude the matter to prioritise the interests of the bank, its shareholders, and other stakeholders. The bank had already accounted for the financial penalty in 2022, ensuring no material financial impact on its operations.
The Barclays settlement underscores the FCA‘s ongoing commitment to addressing corporate misconduct, even years after the events. It also draws comparisons to other recent regulatory actions. Earlier this year, Metro Bank faced a £16.7 million fine for significant anti-money laundering failures that left over £51 billion in transactions insufficiently monitored. Similarly, fines imposed on Starling Bank and Citigroup in 2024 highlight the FCA’s stringent approach to ensuring financial institutions uphold their regulatory obligations.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Seaprimecapitals Withdrawal Problems: A Complete Guide to Risks and User Experiences
Worries about Seaprimecapitals withdrawal problems and possible Seaprimecapitals withdrawal delay are important for any trader. Being able to get your money quickly and reliably is the foundation of trust between a trader and their broker. When questions come up about this basic process, it's important to look into what's causing them. This guide will tackle these concerns head-on, giving you a clear, fact-based look at Seaprimecapitals' withdrawal processes, user experiences, and trading conditions. Most importantly, we'll connect these real-world issues to the single most important factor behind them: whether the broker is properly regulated. Understanding this connection is key to figuring out the real risk to your capital and making a smart decision.

iFX Brokers Review: Do Traders Face Withdrawal Issues, Deposit Credit Failures & Free Coupon Mess?
Have you had to pay several fees at iFX Brokers? Had your trading profit been transferred to a scamming website, causing you losses? Failed to receive withdrawals from your iFX Brokers trading account? Has your deposit failed to reflect in your trading account? Got deceived in the name of a free coupon? Did the broker officials not help you in resolving your queries? Your problems resonate with many of your fellow traders at iFX Brokers. In this iFX Brokers review article, we have explained these problems and attached traders’ screenshots. Read on!

NinjaTrader Exposed: Why Traders are Calling Out NinjaTrader’s Lifetime Plan & Chart Data
Did NinjaTrader onboard you in the name of the Lifetime Plan, but its ordinary customer service left you in a poor trading state? Do you witness price chart-related discrepancies on the NinjaTrader app? Did you have to go through numerous identity and address proof checks for account approval? These problems occupy much of the NinjaTrader review online. In this article, we have discussed these through complaint screenshots. Take a look!

Vietnam Forex Fraud Kingpin Arrested in Philippines
Vietnam forex fraud suspect Le Khac Ngo arrested in Philippines as authorities uncover record-breaking cross-border investment scam.
