She Thought She Found Love. Instead, She Lost 1.5 Million Baht and a Luxury Sports Car.
He Claimed Elite Connections. She Ended Up Losing Millions and Her Dream Car
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:Gabriel Hay & Gavin Mayo indicted for $22M crypto fraud. Learn about the Vault of Gems scam and how to avoid NFT rug pull schemes.

Authorities have indicted two Southern California men for allegedly defrauding investors out of over $22 million in cryptocurrency schemes. Gabriel Hay, 23, of Beverly Hills, and Gavin Mayo, 23, of Thousand Oaks, are accused of orchestrating a series of fraudulent projects involving nonfungible tokens (NFTs) and digital assets, according to federal prosecutors.
Prosecutors allege that between May 2021 and May 2024, Hay and Mayo, along with an unnamed co-conspirator, operated multiple “rug pull” schemes. In these schemes, they collected substantial funds from investors before abandoning the projects, keeping the money for personal use.
One such project, Vault of Gems, was promoted as the first NFT “pegged to a hard asset.” The duo falsely claimed partnerships with jewelers and the development of an exclusive exchange for jewelry retailers. Despite their promises, the project was abandoned, leaving investors frustrated and defrauded.
Cryptocurrency, a decentralized form of digital money, has gained immense popularity. Major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana offer investment opportunities, but they also attract scammers. NFTs, unique digital assets used as proof of ownership, have become a prime target for fraudsters.

Hay and Mayo allegedly used these digital tools to their advantage, transferring funds from their projects into personal wallets. Their fraudulent ventures included names like Faceless, Sinful Souls, Clout Coin, Dirty Dogs, Uncovered, MoonPortal, Squiggles, and Roost Coin.
The U.S. Department of Justice is cracking down on such schemes. Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole Argentieri stated, “Fraudsters take advantage of new technologies and financial products to steal investors hard-earned money.”
Hay and Mayo now face one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, two counts of wire fraud, and one count of stalking. If convicted, they could face up to 20 years in prison for each conspiracy and wire fraud charge, plus an additional five years for the stalking charge.
In a separate charge, prosecutors allege that Hay and Mayo harassed a project manager who revealed their connection to fraudulent projects. The indictment claims they sent threatening messages to the manager and his family, posing as lawyers and investors. The threats escalated to false accusations and harassment through social media, demonstrating the lengths the accused went to silence whistleblowers.
The indictment of Gabriel Hay and Gavin Mayo serves as a stark reminder of the risks associated with cryptocurrency and NFT investments. While these digital assets hold great promise, they also provide a fertile ground for scams. Investors should conduct thorough research, verify the legitimacy of projects, and remain vigilant against red flags like unrealistic claims and lack of transparency.
As authorities crack down on fraudulent activities, the hope is that stricter enforcement and increased awareness will protect investors from similar schemes in the future.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

He Claimed Elite Connections. She Ended Up Losing Millions and Her Dream Car

Walk into any forex marketing pitch in India in 2026 and the first claim you will hear is some variation of "we are regulated by multiple international authorities". The implication is obvious — multiple regulators equals safer brokers. But after WikiFX has documented thousands of complaint cases from Indian and other South Asian traders, one inconvenient truth has become impossible to ignore: Not all regulatory licences are equal. Not even close. A broker can claim "regulated by 5 authorities" — and if those 5 authorities are all offshore-tier (MISA, Vanuatu, Seychelles, Saint Lucia, Comoros), it offers approximately the same protection as no regulation at all. Meanwhile, a single FCA or ASIC licence carries more practical investor protection than a dozen offshore registrations stacked together. This is the WikiFX 2026 ranking of forex brokers by genuine regulatory credibility — measured not by quantity of licences, but by the strength and enforcement weight of the regulators behind

XTB, a veteran with over 15 years of experience in the competitive brokerage industry, has reportedly been facing severe user allegations concerning a tedious KYC verification process and blocked withdrawals despite numerous requests by traders globally. Traders worldwide, including those from the United States and the United Kingdom, have objected to the broker’s operational methodology in 2026. If you are one of them, this XTB review is worth reading! In this article, we have examined several user allegations to understand their concerns. Additionally, we have shared our analysis on the XTB regulation status. The holistic approach adopted by us will likely help you make an informed brokerage decision.

Globinok, a Comoros-based new-age trading enterprise, is receiving bad reviews from users across India, in particular. These users have accused the brokerage firm of failing to deliver on their trading promise. This included failing to ensure the AI-based trading experience promised by them. The sudden disappearance of the account manager has been another key complaint highlighted by users. In this Globinok review article, we have shared user reviews and a regulatory overview of the broker.