简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SILEGX Investment Scam Unravels: Millions Lost in Crypto Fraud
Abstract:Authorities in Malaysia have launched investigations into the SILEGX investment scam, which has resulted in financial losses amounting to RM41.5 million. A total of 46 investigation papers have been opened, with victims spanning a range of professions, including retirees, businessmen, teachers, engineers, and a doctor.

Authorities in Malaysia have launched investigations into the SILEGX investment scam, which has resulted in financial losses amounting to RM41.5 million. A total of 46 investigation papers have been opened, with victims spanning a range of professions, including retirees, businessmen, teachers, engineers, and a doctor. The fraudulent scheme primarily targeted retirees, who accounted for a significant portion of those deceived.
The syndicate behind SILEGX actively promoted the investment scheme on social media platforms, enticing potential investors through advertisements. Those who expressed interest were subsequently added to WhatsApp or Telegram groups, where further details about the investment were provided. The scammers used persuasive tactics, including fabricated testimonials and manipulated account statements, to convince victims of the legitimacy of the scheme. Investigations have revealed that 39 bank accounts were utilised to receive funds from victims, with 37 of them registered under company names and the remaining two under businesses. These accounts have since been frozen as authorities work to identify those responsible.
Among the latest cases reported, three retirees collectively lost RM9.4 million between March 10 and March 17. One of the victims, a 71-year-old former civil servant, first encountered the investment opportunity via a Facebook advertisement. After engaging with the operators, he was included in a WhatsApp group where he was persuaded to invest. Over time, he made 42 transactions amounting to RM5 million across eight bank accounts linked to various companies.

Another victim, a 67-year-old retired teacher, was also drawn into the scheme after seeing promotional material online. She was assured of high returns and was encouraged to reinvest her profits. She transferred RM2.5 million before realising that her attempts to withdraw funds were being delayed with repeated demands for additional fees.
The third victim, a 57-year-old former businessman, lost nearly RM1.9 million after being convinced that the scheme was backed by legitimate cryptocurrency trading. He was given access to a fabricated investment dashboard displaying exponential gains, reinforcing his belief in the system. However, when he attempted to retrieve his earnings, he was met with continuous barriers, including requests for verification fees and alleged tax payments.
In early March, the 71-year-old victim was informed that the platform was experiencing operational difficulties and that investors needed to withdraw their funds immediately to prevent their accounts from being frozen. At this point, his investment account reflected an alleged profit of RM1 billion. However, when he attempted to withdraw the funds, he was informed that a processing fee of RM1.01 million was required. Growing suspicious, he opted to report the matter to the authorities.
The scale of the fraud highlights the effectiveness of the scammers tactics in deceiving investors, particularly retirees seeking financial opportunities. The investigation remains ongoing, with authorities working to track the individuals behind the scheme.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

ACY SECURITIES Review: Do Traders Face Withdrawal Discrepancies, Forced Liquidation and Poor Support
Does ACY SECURITIES wipe out your trading gains in the name of scalping arbitrage? Do you find their demand for inventory fees illegitimate? Do you sense a Ponzi scam-like investment when trading through the broker? Have you faced a forced liquidation of your forex positions by ACY SECURITIES? There have been a plethora of forex trading complaints against the broker. Read on as we share the ACY SECURITIES review in this article.

Wayone Capital Exposed: Withdrawal Denials, Poor Refundable Policy & Fund Scams Take Centrestage
Failed to receive funds despite initiating the Wayone Capital withdrawal request? Have you found the broker’s refundable policy manipulative? Did Wayone Capital block your investment fund? Do you constantly face technical issues at Wayone Capital? Many traders have vehemently opposed these scam-like tactics on broker review platforms. In this Wayone Capital review article, we have shared many such complaints. Take a look!

Vida Markets Review: Allegations of Profit Cancellation and Misuse of KYC Docs
Earned profits after months of losses when trading through Vida Markets, but was denied on a false accusation by the broker? Did the broker fraudulently cause you losses that you found on the Vida Markets login? Have you also encountered incidents of KYC document misuse? Unfortunately, these have been the raging issues for traders here. Many have shared negative Vida Markets reviews online. In this article, we have shared many such complaints. Keep reading!

HEADWAY: The Fast Track to Financial Dead-Ends?
In the world of online trading, a surge in complaints is often the first tremor before an earthquake. For the broker HEADWAY, that tremor has become a shockwave. With over 85 formal complaints lodged against the platform in just the last three months, a disturbing pattern has emerged. Our investigation into trader feedback and regulatory records reveals a broker that lures clients with attractive bonuses, only to allegedly trap them with technical anomalies, impossible withdrawal conditions, and a regulatory license that may not offer the protection traders expect.
