简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
RM80 Million in Losses After ‘Islamic’ Scheme Falls Apart
Abstract:A group of 232 investors is urging Malaysian authorities to launch a comprehensive investigation into an Islamic investment scheme that reportedly incurred losses exceeding RM80 million. The scheme, marketed under the guise of Islamic Redeemable Preference Shares (IRPS), is now under scrutiny for alleged misrepresentation and regulatory breaches.

More than 230 investors are asking authorities in Malaysia to investigate a company that ran what was claimed to be a Shariah-compliant investment scheme. The company is believed to have caused losses of at least RM80 million.
The Malaysian International Humanitarian Organisation (MHO) said the scheme looked legitimate at first. It used the name of a well-known Shariah adviser and appeared to follow Islamic financial principles. These factors gave many people confidence to invest.
MHO Secretary-General Datuk Hishamuddin Hashim said the company promoted Islamic Redeemable Preference Shares (IRPS) through marketing agents. The scheme was advertised as being in line with Islamic law. It had Shariah compliance certificates and submitted an official document, called an Information Memorandum (IM), to the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC).
Many investors believed that this meant the scheme was approved by the SC. However, this was not the case. Hishamuddin explained that submitting an IM does not mean the investment is approved, and that it is only allowed for “sophisticated investors”, that is for people with a net asset value of at least RM3 million and who invest a minimum of RM250,000.

In this case, many investors were ordinary people, not qualified under the law. Some invested as little as RM50,000, well below the legal threshold. This raises serious questions about whether the scheme was being offered in a way that broke the rules.
One of the agents who helped market the scheme, Datuk Seri Mahadi Badrul Zaman, said he too was a victim. He claimed to have lost more than RM20.7 million after investing in two of the involved companies.
Mahadi is also known for being the husband of actress Heliza Helmi. His name and his company, AUF MBZ Consortium Plt, were listed last year on the Securities Commission's investor alert list. The SC stated this was because of “unlicensed capital market activities” involving unlisted public company shares.
There is now growing pressure for regulators to take action. MHO wants a full investigation into the scheme, including the role of the Shariah adviser named in the documents. It also wants authorities to investigate whether false advertising and fraud were involved.
Hishamuddin said the case involves the public interest, as the victims include professionals from the oil and gas industry and well-known corporate figures. He urged the SC to open an official investigation and refer the case to the Attorney-Generals Chambers for possible charges.
Meanwhile, the controversy has gained attention on social media. Actress Fathia Latiff previously accused Mahadi of cheating her by failing to deliver a house she paid for five years ago.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Fxcess Review: Profit Deletion, Withdrawal Denials & Illegitimate Account Blocks Irate Traders
Is withdrawing funds from Fxcess a herculean task for forex traders like you? Does it delete profits using manipulative practices? Does your Fxcess forex trading account balance turn to ZERO upon withdrawal request? Or Has your account been blocked when you sought withdrawals from it? These complaints have become extreme under Fxcess Review online. In this article, we have shared a few complaints. Take a look!

FXPIG Exposed: Traders Report Withdrawal Denials, Fund Scams & Regulatory Flags
Do you face massive losses due to astonishing spreads at FXPIG? Have you witnessed multiple trade executions by the Georgia-based forex broker even though you wanted to execute a single order? Has this piled on losses for you? Is the FXPIG withdrawal too slow? Maybe your trading issues resonate with some of your fellow traders. In this FXPIG review article, we have shared these issues so that you can introspect them thoroughly before deciding on the best forex trader.

Does WealthFX Generate Wealth or Losses for Traders? Find Out in This Review
The name WealthFX sounds appealing for all those wishing for a rewarding forex journey. However, behind the aspiring name are multiple complaints against the Comoros-based forex broker. These trading complaints dampen the broker’s reputation in the forex community. In this WealthFX review article, we have shared some of these complaints here. Take a look!

CySEC Flags 21 Unauthorized Broker Websites in 2025 Crackdown
CySEC warns investors about 21 unauthorized broker websites in 2025, including potential clones of major brands. Verify your broker’s license to avoid scams.

