简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Can cryptocurrencies be regarded as mortgage collateral?
Abstract:The U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has issued a directive to mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to begin evaluating cryptocurrency holdings as part of mortgage risk assessment criteria.

The U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has issued a directive to mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to begin evaluating cryptocurrency holdings as part of mortgage risk assessment criteria.
The move marks a potential turning point for crypto adoption in the U.S. housing market and reflects the federal governments evolving stance on digital assets.
A Boost for Crypto-Holding Borrowers
The directive, announced Wednesday by FHFA Director William Pulte via social media, signals an effort to make mortgage financing more accessible for homebuyers who hold digital assets.
“After extensive research and in line with President Trump‘s vision to make America the ’crypto capital of the world, I have directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to prepare for the inclusion of cryptocurrency holdings as recognized assets in mortgage applications,” Pulte posted.
While some smaller lenders in the U.S. have previously accepted crypto as collateral, this is the first time a federal housing authority has formally acknowledged digital assets in mortgage underwriting standards.

The FHFA's move comes at a time when mortgage application volumes remain sluggish, weighed down by high interest rates and affordability challenges. By expanding the definition of eligible assets, the agency is not only increasing accessibility but also potentially stimulating loan activity in a stagnating housing market.
Analysts note that this change could unlock lending opportunities for a growing segment of digitally native borrowers who may not hold significant traditional assets but possess meaningful crypto wealth.
Unanswered Questions Remain
However, the directive stopped short of specifying which cryptocurrencies will be eligible for consideration. This lack of clarity raises questions around volatility, valuation methods, and regulatory consistency, particularly as crypto markets remain highly fluid and decentralized.
Industry experts stress the importance of clear guidelines to prevent abuse and ensure that lenders can accurately assess risk.
“This is a bold step, but the details will matter. Without standardized rules on acceptable coins, pricing models, and custody requirements, implementation will be complex,” said a senior analyst at a Washington-based financial policy think tank.
Aligning with the Trump Administration's Crypto Agenda
The FHFA‘s move aligns closely with the Trump administration’s broader agenda to promote cryptocurrency adoption across financial sectors. Since returning to the political spotlight, former President Trump has repeatedly voiced support for blockchain innovation and digital finance infrastructure in the U.S.
The decision also hints at a larger regulatory shift, where federal agencies may begin integrating crypto considerations into other forms of financial oversight and risk modeling.
Conclusion
By instructing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to prepare for crypto asset integration, the FHFA is signaling a historic shift in U.S. housing finance policy. While challenges around implementation, regulation, and market volatility remain, the move opens new doors for crypto-savvy homebuyers and brings the U.S. one step closer to mainstreaming digital assets.
As the details unfold, all eyes will be on how the mortgage industry responds — and whether the FHFAs bold step will usher in a new era of crypto-backed home ownership.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

ACY SECURITIES Review: Do Traders Face Withdrawal Discrepancies, Forced Liquidation and Poor Support
Does ACY SECURITIES wipe out your trading gains in the name of scalping arbitrage? Do you find their demand for inventory fees illegitimate? Do you sense a Ponzi scam-like investment when trading through the broker? Have you faced a forced liquidation of your forex positions by ACY SECURITIES? There have been a plethora of forex trading complaints against the broker. Read on as we share the ACY SECURITIES review in this article.

Wayone Capital Exposed: Withdrawal Denials, Poor Refundable Policy & Fund Scams Take Centrestage
Failed to receive funds despite initiating the Wayone Capital withdrawal request? Have you found the broker’s refundable policy manipulative? Did Wayone Capital block your investment fund? Do you constantly face technical issues at Wayone Capital? Many traders have vehemently opposed these scam-like tactics on broker review platforms. In this Wayone Capital review article, we have shared many such complaints. Take a look!

Vida Markets Review: Allegations of Profit Cancellation and Misuse of KYC Docs
Earned profits after months of losses when trading through Vida Markets, but was denied on a false accusation by the broker? Did the broker fraudulently cause you losses that you found on the Vida Markets login? Have you also encountered incidents of KYC document misuse? Unfortunately, these have been the raging issues for traders here. Many have shared negative Vida Markets reviews online. In this article, we have shared many such complaints. Keep reading!

Is Forex Trading a Scam or Do People Actually Make Money From It?
Mention the word forex in Malaysia, and you will often hear immediate reactions: “It is a scam”, “It is like a money game”, or “Everyone loses”. Is forex trading a scam, or do people actually make money from it?!
