Assexmarkets Review: Is Assexmarkets Legit?
Assexmarkets Review 2025 shows a WikiFX score of 1.23/10, flagged for no valid regulation and risky operations.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:CHINA BEST review of regulation, license, and broker operations in Hong Kong. Analysis of SFC oversight, client safety, and risk alerts.

CHINA BEST INTERNATIONAL, operating under Zhonghao International Futures Co. Ltd., is licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong. The firm holds license number AAW438, effective since 2003, authorizing it to deal in futures contracts.
The SFCs oversight places CHINA BEST within a regulated framework, which is a critical factor for investors assessing broker legitimacy. However, regulatory status alone does not eliminate operational risks, as highlighted by independent field surveys and client alerts.

The brokers long-standing license suggests stability, but investors should note that WikiFX flagged risk alerts in 2025, citing negative field survey reviews. This indicates that while the broker is formally regulated, its operational transparency and client experience may vary.
The broker claims to provide diversified services through Zhongrong International, including Hong Kong securities, local and foreign futures, securities advisory, and asset management. Trading is conducted via the Yisheng Polestar trading system, available in both real and simulated versions.

Independent verification efforts in Hong Kong produced conflicting findings. While one survey confirmed an office presence at No. 5 Canton Road, Yau Tsim Mong District, another inspection reported no physical presence at a listed address on Tseung Kwan Road.
This inconsistency raises concerns about the brokers transparency and accessibility—key factors for client trust. Investors should weigh these findings carefully before engaging.
Zhongrong International applies a 0.25% commission per stock transaction, with a minimum fee of HK$100. Payments are accepted via checks, transfers, and wire deposits into designated accounts.
While the fee structure is straightforward, the lack of clarity around additional charges or platform costs may affect overall competitiveness compared to other Hong Kong-based brokers.
The CHINA BEST review highlights a broker with a long regulatory history under the SFC, diversified product offerings, and a functioning trading platform. However, the risk alerts, inconsistent office verification, and limited transparency present red flags that potential clients should not ignore.
For investors seeking exposure to Hong Kong and international futures markets, CHINA BEST offers regulated access. Yet, due diligence is essential—verifying office presence, testing customer support responsiveness, and comparing fee structures against competitors should be part of any decision-making process.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Assexmarkets Review 2025 shows a WikiFX score of 1.23/10, flagged for no valid regulation and risky operations.

RaiseFX Review reveals low WikiFX score, hidden withdrawal fees, and serious doubts about its trustworthiness.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.

When choosing a broker, the most important question is always: "Are my funds safe?" The answer depends on the broker's regulatory framework. For a company like AMarkets, which has been operating since 2007, understanding its licensing isn't just about checking a box. It's about understanding what that regulation truly means for your protection as a trader. This article provides a clear, detailed breakdown of AMarkets' licenses, what their offshore status really means, the extra safety measures it uses, and the risks you need to consider. We will go beyond marketing claims to give you factual, balanced information about their official licenses and other trust signals, helping you make a smart decision.