Assexmarkets Review: Is Assexmarkets Legit?
Assexmarkets Review 2025 shows a WikiFX score of 1.23/10, flagged for no valid regulation and risky operations.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Bold Prime Regulation Review: ASIC license revoked. Learn the risks of trading with unregulated brokers and why oversight matters.

Bold Prime, once tied to Australia‘s Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), has seen its regulatory standing collapse. Regulation is the invisible shield protecting traders in the volatile world of forex and CFDs. Without it, investors are exposed to unnecessary risks. This review explores the broker’s licensing journey, its current status, and what traders should know before engaging with it.
Bold Prime Pty Ltd entered the market with ambitions of becoming a global broker. To establish credibility, it operated as an Appointed Representative (AR) under STAR FUNDS MANAGEMENT PTY LTD.
This structure allowed Bold Prime to market itself as regulated in Australia, but the distinction matters. An Appointed Representative does not hold a direct license—it operates under another firms authorization. For traders, this means oversight is indirect and weaker compared to brokers with full ASIC licenses.
For years, Bold Prime leaned on this framework:
These details reveal a broker whose regulatory foundation was borrowed rather than earned.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is one of the most respected regulators globally. Brokers under ASIC oversight must meet strict standards, including:
These safeguards are designed to protect traders from fraud, insolvency, and malpractice.
Bold Prime‘s reliance on an Appointed Representative license meant it was never directly accountable to ASIC. Instead, STAR FUNDS MANAGEMENT carried the responsibility. This indirect relationship left Bold Prime’s compliance weaker than brokers holding full ASIC licenses.
On August 17, 2023, Bold Primes appointed representative license was officially revoked.
Key Details:
Revocation means Bold Prime no longer has the legal right to claim ASIC oversight. For traders, this translates into a loss of protection—no audits, no dispute resolution, no safety net.

The consequences of losing ASIC oversight are far‑reaching:
Independent review platforms echo this sentiment, warning traders against using brokers that are not regulated by top‑tier authorities.
| License Status | Revoked | Active |
| Investor Protection | None | Strong |
| Oversight | Absent | Continuous |
| Credibility | Questioned | Established |
This comparison highlights the gulf between Bold Primes current standing and brokers maintaining active ASIC licenses.
Regulation is more than a legal requirement—it is the backbone of trust in financial markets. Traders rely on regulators to enforce standards that prevent fraud, mismanagement, and abuse.
When a license is revoked, confidence evaporates. Traders are left to rely on the broker‘s word rather than the regulator’s oversight. Thats a gamble few investors can afford.
Bold Primes license revocation in August 2023 highlights the risks traders face with unregulated brokers. Losing ASIC oversight means no investor protection or dispute resolution.
Traders must always check a brokers current regulatory status before investing. Active licenses from top regulators like ASIC, FCA, or CySEC ensure transparency and security.
Bold Primes revoked license is a clear warning. For safety and trust, choose brokers with valid, reputable regulatory credentials.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Assexmarkets Review 2025 shows a WikiFX score of 1.23/10, flagged for no valid regulation and risky operations.

RaiseFX Review reveals low WikiFX score, hidden withdrawal fees, and serious doubts about its trustworthiness.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.

When choosing a broker, the most important question is always: "Are my funds safe?" The answer depends on the broker's regulatory framework. For a company like AMarkets, which has been operating since 2007, understanding its licensing isn't just about checking a box. It's about understanding what that regulation truly means for your protection as a trader. This article provides a clear, detailed breakdown of AMarkets' licenses, what their offshore status really means, the extra safety measures it uses, and the risks you need to consider. We will go beyond marketing claims to give you factual, balanced information about their official licenses and other trust signals, helping you make a smart decision.