SandStoneFX

SandStoneFX, operating as Ever Financial Global Limited, holds a WikiFX score of 1.14, which reflects a profile with significant underlying concerns. A primary factor in this low evaluation is its status as an unregulated entity. The broker operates without any valid, authoritative forex trading licenses, placing client funds entirely outside established financial oversight and protection schemes that govern reputable firms. Furthermore, its registered business scope in Mauritius is flagged as suspicious. The combination of a lack of regulation and questionable operational parameters indicates a high-risk environment where standard protections for client capital and segregated accounts cannot be assured.

According to WikiFX assessment, SandStoneFX does not hold any verified regulatory licenses from mainstream financial authorities. The entity is not regulated for forex trading activities in any recognized jurisdiction. Operating under the company name Ever Financial Global Limited and registered in Mauritius, its business scope has been identified as suspicious. The absence of valid licensing means the broker operates without the external audits, capital adequacy requirements, and client compensation schemes mandated by bodies such as the FCA, ASIC, or CySEC. This places it in the category of an unregulated entity.

Contact details for SandStoneFX are not publicly disclosed or readily verifiable through standard professional channels. As an unregulated entity operating without the transparency requirements imposed on licensed brokers, specific contact information such as a verified physical office address, official customer support phone numbers, or corporate email addresses are not available for objective confirmation. This lack of accessible and verifiable contact information is consistent with the broker's overall opaque operational profile and heightens due diligence challenges for potential clients.

Recovering funds after investment fraud can be difficult, but taking timely action may still help recover part of the losses. It is recommended to take the following actions immediately: keep trading records, chat records, and other evidence; contact the bank to try to stop or freeze the payment; report the case to local law enforcement agencies. In addition, investors can also use WikiFX complaint and exposure channels to increase the visibility of problematic platforms and improve the efficiency of rights protection.

WikiFX ratings are calculated based on a multi-dimensional data model, mainly including five dimensions: regulatory index, license index, business index, risk control index, and software index. The rating adopts a range system (0-10 points). The higher the score, the higher the broker's overall performance level. In addition, ratings are dynamically updated according to regulatory changes, complaint handling results, and historical data performance, making the rating more objective and timely. You can check the scores of each dimension and their trends on the WikiFX platform to evaluate the broker's actual situation more comprehensively.

To compare different brokers, investors can make comprehensive judgments from multiple dimensions such as regulatory qualifications, overall ratings, trading environment, account conditions, and user feedback. In general, priority should be given to regulatory status and license information, followed by WikiFX ratings and various indexes (such as risk control, software, and business indexes). At the same time, trading conditions (such as spreads and execution speed) and account information (such as minimum deposit and account types) should also be compared. In addition, user reviews, exposure records, and risk assessment information can also be considered to evaluate broker safety and trading experience from multiple aspects. The WikiFX platform also provides multi-dimensional broker comparison tools. Users can select different brokers for visual comparison and comprehensive analysis, so as to make decisions more efficiently.

Common forex regulatory authorities include the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the United Kingdom, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). These regulatory authorities usually maintain relatively high regulatory standards, and brokers regulated by them generally have higher compliance levels. You can check broker ranking lists under different regulators on the WikiFX platform, such as brokers regulated by FCA, ASIC, and CySEC, so as to compare brokers under different regulatory backgrounds more clearly and make safer choices.

If a broker holds multiple regulatory licenses, it usually means that it operates in multiple countries or regions and needs to comply with the requirements of different regulatory authorities. Its overall credibility is generally higher. However, it should be noted that regulatory strength differs between licenses. Some offshore regulations have weaker restrictions, so safety should not be judged only by the number of licenses. It is recommended to focus on whether the broker holds licenses from major regulators such as FCA or ASIC, and evaluate its regulatory status, historical records, and overall rating together. You can also check all regulatory information and performance under different regulators on the WikiFX platform to more comprehensively assess its actual risk level.