PROREX LIMITED

PROREX LIMITED holds a Mauritius FSC Securities Trading License (EP) and is classified as regulated. However, user feedback includes a complaint about withdrawal delays, and the broker's core score is 5.86 out of 10. Safety and reliability depend on individual risk tolerance; no financial advice is provided.

Yes, PROREX LIMITED is regulated by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Mauritius under license number GB24203352, holding a Securities Trading License (EP) with a regulatory status of 'Regulated'.

The minimum deposit for both the ECN and Standard account types is $100.

PROREX LIMITED supports MT5 (MetaTrader 5) with a full license. It does not support MT4.

Pros: Regulated by the Mauritius FSC, offers ECN account with spreads from 0.0, supports MT5, multiple deposit methods, and allows scalping and EA trading. Cons: Short operating history (1-2 years), low business and license indices (4.78 and 4.62), a user complaint about withdrawal delays, and limited maximum leverage of 1:200.

Yes, there is at least one user complaint regarding a withdrawal of $10,000 that was not processed, along with communication issues. Other reviews are positive or neutral.

PROREX LIMITED is registered in Mauritius and its availability in the US region is not currently publicly specified.

Deposits are offered via multiple methods (e.g., Perfect Money, ThunderxPay, credit cards, local transfers) with processing times ranging from 24 hours to 7-10 banking days. Withdrawals are available via BEP-20, but processing times are not specified. A user complaint indicates potential delays in withdrawals.

PROREX LIMITED offers two account types: ECN and Standard. Both have a minimum deposit of $100, maximum leverage of 1:200, and support scalping, EA, and lock positions. The ECN account has spreads from 0.0 pips, while the Standard account has variable spreads.

User reviews are mixed. One user reported a withdrawal issue, another gave a positive review citing cooperation, and a third gave a neutral review for receiving a bonus quickly.

To compare different brokers, investors can make comprehensive judgments from multiple dimensions such as regulatory qualifications, overall ratings, trading environment, account conditions, and user feedback. In general, priority should be given to regulatory status and license information, followed by WikiFX ratings and various indexes (such as risk control, software, and business indexes). At the same time, trading conditions (such as spreads and execution speed) and account information (such as minimum deposit and account types) should also be compared. In addition, user reviews, exposure records, and risk assessment information can also be considered to evaluate broker safety and trading experience from multiple aspects. The WikiFX platform also provides multi-dimensional broker comparison tools. Users can select different brokers for visual comparison and comprehensive analysis, so as to make decisions more efficiently.

A cloned broker website refers to a fraudulent website that imitates the information of a legitimate broker. Such websites usually copy the real company's brand name, page design, and even regulatory information to mislead investors into making deposits. Common features include: a domain name highly similar to the official website (such as slight spelling differences), abnormal or unverifiable contact information, and promises of unusually high returns. Once funds enter such platforms, they are usually difficult to recover. Investors can identify potential risks by checking the official domain name, verifying regulatory information, and using WikiFX for cross-verification.

When choosing a safe broker, investors should focus on key factors such as regulatory qualifications, fund security, and trading transparency. In general, priority should be given to platforms regulated by major regulatory authorities, such as the Financial Conduct Authority, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. At the same time, attention should also be paid to: whether client funds are kept in segregated accounts, whether the fee structure is transparent, and whether there are many negative complaints or withdrawal problems. By combining WikiFX ratings and user feedback, investors can evaluate broker risks more comprehensively.

If a broker holds multiple regulatory licenses, it usually means that it operates in multiple countries or regions and needs to comply with the requirements of different regulatory authorities. Its overall credibility is generally higher. However, it should be noted that regulatory strength differs between licenses. Some offshore regulations have weaker restrictions, so safety should not be judged only by the number of licenses. It is recommended to focus on whether the broker holds licenses from major regulators such as FCA or ASIC, and evaluate its regulatory status, historical records, and overall rating together. You can also check all regulatory information and performance under different regulators on the WikiFX platform to more comprehensively assess its actual risk level.

WikiFX ratings are calculated based on a multi-dimensional data model, mainly including five dimensions: regulatory index, license index, business index, risk control index, and software index. The rating adopts a range system (0-10 points). The higher the score, the higher the broker's overall performance level. In addition, ratings are dynamically updated according to regulatory changes, complaint handling results, and historical data performance, making the rating more objective and timely. You can check the scores of each dimension and their trends on the WikiFX platform to evaluate the broker's actual situation more comprehensively.