91PME.COM

According to WikiFX data, 91PME.COM holds a core score of 6.73, indicating a moderate overall risk profile. The broker is regulated by the Hong Kong Gold Exchange (HKGX) under a Precious Metals Trading license (No. 106). However, HKGX is a self-regulatory industry association rather than a government financial regulator, which means its oversight framework is less stringent than that of major statutory bodies. Traders should weigh this regulatory context alongside the broker's operational history of 5–10 years and its regional focus in Hong Kong.

Yes, 91PME.COM is regulated. It holds a Precious Metals Trading (AGN) license (No. 106) issued by the Hong Kong Gold Exchange (HKGX), a self-regulatory industry association in Hong Kong. The license is listed under the holding company 鑫匯寶貴金屬有限公司. While this provides a degree of regulatory oversight, it is important to note that HKGX is not a government-backed financial regulator, which may limit the scope of investor protection.

The minimum deposit amount for 91PME.COM is not publicly disclosed by the broker. Prospective traders seeking this information should contact the broker’s customer support directly for precise account opening requirements.

Yes, 91PME.COM supports the MetaTrader 4 (MT4) platform. According to WikiFX data, the broker holds two full MT4 licenses. The average execution speed on these platforms is 50.12 milliseconds, indicating a relatively fast trading environment. No MT5 licenses are reported.

Pros: 1. Regulated by the Hong Kong Gold Exchange (HKGX), providing a formal licensing framework. 2. Offers the widely used MT4 trading platform with two full licenses and fast execution (average 50.12 ms). 3. Has an operational history of 5–10 years, suggesting some market experience. Cons: 1. The HKGX is a self-regulatory industry association, not a government regulator, which may offer weaker investor protection. 2. WikiFX user exposure reports highlight recurring issues such as withdrawal delays, platform manipulation, and slippage, which raise concerns about the trading environment.

Yes, WikiFX data shows multiple user complaints against 91PME.COM. Common themes include withdrawal delays, platform manipulation (e.g., slippage and order execution issues), difficulties in modifying stop-loss/take-profit levels, and reports of funds being frozen. Some users also allege that the broker requires additional deposits before allowing withdrawals. These complaints should be carefully considered by potential traders.

Due to the temporary lack of publicly available data, it is not possible to determine whether it is available in the United States. In general, to judge whether a broker can be used in a certain region, you can refer to the following aspects: 1. Regulatory qualifications: Check whether the broker is regulated by major regulators (such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in the United States). 2. Legal restrictions: Different countries and regions have different laws and regulations on forex and CFD trading. Some platforms may not provide services in certain regions. 3. Account opening information: Check whether the broker allows users from that region to register accounts. 4. Official announcements and customer service: Confirm the local usage policy through the broker's official website or customer service. 5. User feedback: Refer to other users' experience and complaints in that region. You can use the information above to judge its availability in the United States. At the same time, you can follow WikiFX updates on regulatory and availability data to get more accurate reference.

Official deposit and withdrawal processing times are not disclosed by the broker. However, user reports on WikiFX indicate significant concerns: many users claim that withdrawal requests are delayed or denied, and that the broker often requires additional deposits before releasing funds. Deposit methods are reportedly via personal bank accounts rather than segregated corporate accounts, which raises questions about fund security. Prospective traders should exercise caution and verify all terms directly with the broker.

Due to the temporary lack of detailed account type data, it is not possible to clearly determine which account types it provides. In general, most brokers offer several account types to meet the needs of different investors, such as Standard accounts, ECN accounts, or low-spread accounts. When choosing an account type, you can focus on the following aspects: 1. Minimum deposit requirement: Different accounts have different deposit requirements. Beginners are usually more suitable for accounts with low requirements. 2. Fee structure: Different accounts may have different charges for spreads and commissions. 3. Leverage level: Different accounts support different leverage levels, and the risk also changes. 4. Trading conditions: Such as minimum lot size, execution speed, and whether EA is supported. 5. Demo accounts: Beginners can practice through demo accounts to reduce real trading risk. It is recommended to choose an account type based on the factors above. At the same time, you can follow WikiFX updates on related data and ratings to get more complete reference.

User reviews on WikiFX are predominantly negative. The broker’s overall score is 6.73, but the exposure section contains numerous complaints. Common criticisms include withdrawal delays or denials, platform manipulation (e.g., slippage, order execution issues), poor customer service, and demands for additional deposits before withdrawals. Some users also report that the platform is not transparent and that funds are transferred to personal accounts. These reviews highlight significant operational and trust concerns.

A cloned broker website refers to a fraudulent website that imitates the information of a legitimate broker. Such websites usually copy the real company's brand name, page design, and even regulatory information to mislead investors into making deposits. Common features include: a domain name highly similar to the official website (such as slight spelling differences), abnormal or unverifiable contact information, and promises of unusually high returns. Once funds enter such platforms, they are usually difficult to recover. Investors can identify potential risks by checking the official domain name, verifying regulatory information, and using WikiFX for cross-verification.

WikiFX is a third-party platform that provides forex broker information inquiry and risk alerts. This type of platform mainly integrates brokers' regulatory information, user feedback, and historical records, and conducts comprehensive evaluation through a multi-dimensional model to help investors quickly understand the broker's basic situation and potential risks. By using such tools, investors can conduct preliminary screening before choosing a broker, thereby reducing decision-making risks caused by information asymmetry.

A broker can be evaluated as a potential scam platform by considering multiple factors such as regulatory qualifications, user complaints, fund security, and platform data. In general, brokers without valid regulation, those that frequently have withdrawal problems, those with a large number of user complaints, or those providing false information usually carry higher risks. You can check the broker's regulatory status, overall rating, exposure records, and user reviews on the WikiFX platform, and make judgments based on multi-dimensional data to effectively identify and avoid scam platform risks.

Recovering funds after investment fraud can be difficult, but taking timely action may still help recover part of the losses. It is recommended to take the following actions immediately: keep trading records, chat records, and other evidence; contact the bank to try to stop or freeze the payment; report the case to local law enforcement agencies. In addition, investors can also use WikiFX complaint and exposure channels to increase the visibility of problematic platforms and improve the efficiency of rights protection.

WikiFX ratings are calculated based on a multi-dimensional data model, mainly including five dimensions: regulatory index, license index, business index, risk control index, and software index. The rating adopts a range system (0-10 points). The higher the score, the higher the broker's overall performance level. In addition, ratings are dynamically updated according to regulatory changes, complaint handling results, and historical data performance, making the rating more objective and timely. You can check the scores of each dimension and their trends on the WikiFX platform to evaluate the broker's actual situation more comprehensively.