简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC Lawsuit Claims Elon Musk Cheated Twitter Shareholders Out of $150 Million
Abstract:The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit alleging that Elon Musk, the billionaire founder of Tesla and SpaceX, cheated Twitter shareholders out of more than $150 million by delaying the disclosure of his growing stake in the company as he prepared to launch a takeover bid.

According to report, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit alleging that Elon Musk, the billionaire founder of Tesla and SpaceX, cheated Twitter shareholders out of more than $150 million by delaying the disclosure of his growing stake in the company as he prepared to launch a takeover bid. The lawsuit, which was filed just days before the Trump administration took office, adds to Musk's long-running tension with the SEC, particularly regarding his role in taking Twitter private.
The SECs Allegations
According to the SEC's complaint, Musk violated securities laws by failing to notify the public promptly about his growing stake in Twitter. The Commission claims Musk accumulated a large number of Twitter shares between January and March 2022, eventually leading to an ownership stake above 5%, a threshold that would have required him to disclose the purchase within 10 days under federal regulations.
Instead, Musk allegedly delayed making the required filing, thus allowing him to accumulate even more shares at a lower price before he ultimately announced his plans to acquire the company in April 2022. By failing to disclose his stake promptly, Musk allegedly misled Twitter investors, artificially inflating the stock price and depriving them of a chance to make informed decisions about their holdings.
The SEC claims this delay resulted in Twitter shareholders losing out on more than $150 million in potential profits. If Musk had disclosed his growing stake on time, shareholders could have potentially sold their shares at a higher price during the period when Musk was gradually accumulating them.
Musks Defense
Musk‘s legal team quickly responded to the SEC’s lawsuit, asserting that the billionaire did nothing wrong and that the SEC‘s case was without merit. Musk’s attorney argued that the SEC was engaging in a baseless attack, claiming that Musk had not violated any securities laws by waiting to disclose his stake. The lawyer insisted that Musk‘s actions were perfectly legal and that the SEC’s claims lacked sufficient evidence to warrant a lawsuit.
Musk himself has made no public statement regarding the latest lawsuit, but he has a history of contentious interactions with the SEC. In 2018, the SEC sued Musk for his Twitter post in which he claimed he had secured funding to take Tesla private at $420 a share—a statement that caused Tesla's stock price to jump. Musk ultimately settled that case by paying a $20 million civil fine, agreeing to have Tesla‘s lawyers vet certain tweets, and stepping down as Tesla’s chairman for three years.

FILE PHOTO: Elon Musk · Reuters
Musks legal battles with the SEC, including his ongoing dispute over his Twitter posts, have painted a complex picture of a billionaire who is unafraid to challenge regulatory authority. While his business empire—spanning electric vehicles, space exploration, and more—has earned him vast wealth and fame, it has also drawn him into frequent confrontations with regulators.
Other Lawsuits Related to Twitter Acquisition
In addition to the SEC‘s lawsuit, Musk faces other legal challenges related to his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter. Shareholders and investors have raised concerns about Musk’s handling of the deal, citing issues such as changes to Twitters management and operations following the acquisition, and allegations of stock manipulation. Musk has also been accused of failing to disclose key information to Twitter shareholders during the bidding process.
As the legal and financial fallout from Musk‘s Twitter purchase continues to unfold, his critics argue that his actions may have harmed both investors and the broader market. However, Musk’s defenders maintain that he acted within the law and that the SECs lawsuit is just another example of government overreach.
Conclusion
Musks legal battles are far from over, but as he faces multiple lawsuits over his Twitter purchase, the implications for both Twitter shareholders and broader market regulations will continue to evolve. For now, Musk remains defiant, and his complex relationship with the SEC shows no signs of ending anytime soon.
The SEC lawsuit marks the latest chapter in Elon Musk‘s long-running legal and regulatory troubles. As the case progresses, it will serve as a critical reminder of the importance of timely disclosures in the world of corporate acquisitions. Whether Musk’s legal strategy will succeed in defeating the SECs claims remains to be seen, but the case will undoubtedly attract continued attention from investors, regulators, and industry watchers alike.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Alpha FX Allegations: Traders Claim Account Blocks, Withdrawal Denials and Security Breaches
Is trading with Alpha FX fraught with too many errors and scams? Have you seen your forex trading account blocked after requesting fund withdrawals with the broker? Invested a heavy amount, but finding it hard to withdraw the sum? Have you seen domain changes while attempting an Alpha FX login? These issues have become typical for Alpha FX traders, with many of them sharing their frustration online. In this Alpha FX review guide, we have shared some trading complaints against the UK-based forex broker. Read on!

In-Depth Review of MH Markets Trading Conditions and Leverage – An Analysis for Experienced Traders
For experienced traders, selecting a broker is a meticulous process that extends far beyond marketing claims and bonus offers. It involves a granular analysis of the core trading environment: the quality of execution, the flexibility of leverage, the integrity of the regulatory framework, and the suitability of the conditions for one's specific strategy. MH Markets, a broker with a 5-10 year operational history, presents a complex and multifaceted profile that warrants such a detailed examination. This in-depth review dissects the MH Markets trading conditions and leverage, using primary data from the global broker inquiry app, WikiFX, to provide a clear, data-driven perspective. We will analyze the broker's execution environment, account structures, and regulatory standing to determine which types of traders might find its offering compelling and what critical risks they must consider.

MH Markets Commission Fees and Spreads Analysis: A Data-Driven Breakdown for Traders
For any experienced trader, the long-term viability of a brokerage partner hinges on a delicate balance of trust, execution quality, and, critically, cost. Trading fees, both direct and indirect, can significantly erode profitability over time. This makes a granular understanding of a broker's cost structure not just beneficial, but essential. This in-depth analysis focuses on MH Markets, breaking down its commission fees, spreads, and other associated costs to provide a clear, data-driven perspective for traders evaluating this broker for their long-term strategies. Drawing primarily on verified data from the global broker inquiry platform WikiFX, alongside other public information, we will dissect the MH Markets spreads commissions cost structure. We aim to move beyond marketing claims and uncover the practical, real-world costs of trading with this broker, helping you determine if its pricing model aligns with your trading style and financial goals.

S.A.M. Trade Under Scrutiny: Withdrawal Denials, Questionable Spreads & Complaints from Traders
Did you find MT4 platform glitches while trading via S.A.M. Trade? Did these glitches disallow you from withdrawing your funds or making an internal transfer? Finding profit on the S.A.M. Trade login, but cannot access it for weeks? Did you fail to withdraw because the authorities found the broker suspicious during their investigation? Have you faced increased trading costs due to manipulated spreads? Many traders have expressed similar concerns while sharing the broker’s review online. In this article, we have decoded S.A.M. Trade reviews. Take a look!
