简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC Lawsuit Claims Elon Musk Cheated Twitter Shareholders Out of $150 Million
Abstract:The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit alleging that Elon Musk, the billionaire founder of Tesla and SpaceX, cheated Twitter shareholders out of more than $150 million by delaying the disclosure of his growing stake in the company as he prepared to launch a takeover bid.

According to report, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit alleging that Elon Musk, the billionaire founder of Tesla and SpaceX, cheated Twitter shareholders out of more than $150 million by delaying the disclosure of his growing stake in the company as he prepared to launch a takeover bid. The lawsuit, which was filed just days before the Trump administration took office, adds to Musk's long-running tension with the SEC, particularly regarding his role in taking Twitter private.
The SECs Allegations
According to the SEC's complaint, Musk violated securities laws by failing to notify the public promptly about his growing stake in Twitter. The Commission claims Musk accumulated a large number of Twitter shares between January and March 2022, eventually leading to an ownership stake above 5%, a threshold that would have required him to disclose the purchase within 10 days under federal regulations.
Instead, Musk allegedly delayed making the required filing, thus allowing him to accumulate even more shares at a lower price before he ultimately announced his plans to acquire the company in April 2022. By failing to disclose his stake promptly, Musk allegedly misled Twitter investors, artificially inflating the stock price and depriving them of a chance to make informed decisions about their holdings.
The SEC claims this delay resulted in Twitter shareholders losing out on more than $150 million in potential profits. If Musk had disclosed his growing stake on time, shareholders could have potentially sold their shares at a higher price during the period when Musk was gradually accumulating them.
Musks Defense
Musk‘s legal team quickly responded to the SEC’s lawsuit, asserting that the billionaire did nothing wrong and that the SEC‘s case was without merit. Musk’s attorney argued that the SEC was engaging in a baseless attack, claiming that Musk had not violated any securities laws by waiting to disclose his stake. The lawyer insisted that Musk‘s actions were perfectly legal and that the SEC’s claims lacked sufficient evidence to warrant a lawsuit.
Musk himself has made no public statement regarding the latest lawsuit, but he has a history of contentious interactions with the SEC. In 2018, the SEC sued Musk for his Twitter post in which he claimed he had secured funding to take Tesla private at $420 a share—a statement that caused Tesla's stock price to jump. Musk ultimately settled that case by paying a $20 million civil fine, agreeing to have Tesla‘s lawyers vet certain tweets, and stepping down as Tesla’s chairman for three years.

FILE PHOTO: Elon Musk · Reuters
Musks legal battles with the SEC, including his ongoing dispute over his Twitter posts, have painted a complex picture of a billionaire who is unafraid to challenge regulatory authority. While his business empire—spanning electric vehicles, space exploration, and more—has earned him vast wealth and fame, it has also drawn him into frequent confrontations with regulators.
Other Lawsuits Related to Twitter Acquisition
In addition to the SEC‘s lawsuit, Musk faces other legal challenges related to his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter. Shareholders and investors have raised concerns about Musk’s handling of the deal, citing issues such as changes to Twitters management and operations following the acquisition, and allegations of stock manipulation. Musk has also been accused of failing to disclose key information to Twitter shareholders during the bidding process.
As the legal and financial fallout from Musk‘s Twitter purchase continues to unfold, his critics argue that his actions may have harmed both investors and the broader market. However, Musk’s defenders maintain that he acted within the law and that the SECs lawsuit is just another example of government overreach.
Conclusion
Musks legal battles are far from over, but as he faces multiple lawsuits over his Twitter purchase, the implications for both Twitter shareholders and broader market regulations will continue to evolve. For now, Musk remains defiant, and his complex relationship with the SEC shows no signs of ending anytime soon.
The SEC lawsuit marks the latest chapter in Elon Musk‘s long-running legal and regulatory troubles. As the case progresses, it will serve as a critical reminder of the importance of timely disclosures in the world of corporate acquisitions. Whether Musk’s legal strategy will succeed in defeating the SECs claims remains to be seen, but the case will undoubtedly attract continued attention from investors, regulators, and industry watchers alike.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Seaprimecapitals Withdrawal Problems: A Complete Guide to Risks and User Experiences
Worries about Seaprimecapitals withdrawal problems and possible Seaprimecapitals withdrawal delay are important for any trader. Being able to get your money quickly and reliably is the foundation of trust between a trader and their broker. When questions come up about this basic process, it's important to look into what's causing them. This guide will tackle these concerns head-on, giving you a clear, fact-based look at Seaprimecapitals' withdrawal processes, user experiences, and trading conditions. Most importantly, we'll connect these real-world issues to the single most important factor behind them: whether the broker is properly regulated. Understanding this connection is key to figuring out the real risk to your capital and making a smart decision.

iFX Brokers Review: Do Traders Face Withdrawal Issues, Deposit Credit Failures & Free Coupon Mess?
Have you had to pay several fees at iFX Brokers? Had your trading profit been transferred to a scamming website, causing you losses? Failed to receive withdrawals from your iFX Brokers trading account? Has your deposit failed to reflect in your trading account? Got deceived in the name of a free coupon? Did the broker officials not help you in resolving your queries? Your problems resonate with many of your fellow traders at iFX Brokers. In this iFX Brokers review article, we have explained these problems and attached traders’ screenshots. Read on!

NinjaTrader Exposed: Why Traders are Calling Out NinjaTrader’s Lifetime Plan & Chart Data
Did NinjaTrader onboard you in the name of the Lifetime Plan, but its ordinary customer service left you in a poor trading state? Do you witness price chart-related discrepancies on the NinjaTrader app? Did you have to go through numerous identity and address proof checks for account approval? These problems occupy much of the NinjaTrader review online. In this article, we have discussed these through complaint screenshots. Take a look!

World Forex Review: Does the Broker Deny Withdrawals and Scam Traders via Fake Bonuses?
Does World Forex prove to be a not-so-happy trading experience for you? Do you struggle to withdraw your funds from the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker? Do you witness hassles depositing funds? Failing to leverage the World Forex no deposit bonus, as it turned out to be false? These accusations are grabbing everyone’s attention when reading the World Forex review online. In this article, we have shared some of these. Read on!
