天眼评分
Tiger Markets(test)
http://www.tigermarketsld.com
官方网址
评分指数
影响力
影响力
C
影响力指数 NO.1
联系方式
账户信息
- 交易环境--
- 货币--
- 最大杠杆--
- 支持EA
- 最低入金--
- 最小点差--
- 入金方式--
- 出金方式--
- 最小头寸--
- 手续费--
- 交易品种123123
浏览 Tiger Markets(test) 的用户还浏览了..
官网鉴定
tigermarketsld.com
3.33.130.190服务器所在地美国
备案号--主要访问国家/地区--域名创建时间--网站名称--所属公司--
关系族谱
公司简介
公司简介
企业简介
企业画像
- 1-2年
- 塞浦路斯监管
- 直通牌照(STP)
- cTrader
- 自研
- 展业区域存疑
- 中级风险隐患
英文介绍 英文介绍 英文介绍 英文介绍 英文介绍 英文介绍 英文介绍 英文介绍 英文介绍 英文介绍 英文介绍 英文介绍 英文介绍 英文介绍 英文介绍
资讯

汇评 A股股票回购一览:32家公司披露回购进展
Wind数据显示,9月21日,共32家公司发布股票回购相关公告。其中,7家公司首次披露股票回购预案,7家公司回购方案获股东大会通过,13家公司披露股票回购实施进展,5家公司回购方案已实施完毕。从首次披露回购预案来看,当日共5家公司股票回购预案金额超千万。贵州茅台、滨化股份、北京科锐回购预案金额最高,分别拟回购不超60.0亿元、1.5亿元、1.0亿元。从股东大会通过回购预案来看,当日共4家公司回购预

新闻 9月LPR按兵不动:1年期3.35% 5年期以上3.85%
【9月LPR按兵不动:1年期3.35% 5年期以上3.85%】中国人民银行授权全国银行间同业拆借中心公布,2024年9月20日贷款市场报价利率(LPR)为:1年期LPR为3.35%,5年期以上LPR为3.85%,均与前一期持平。以上LPR在下一次发布LPR之前有效。【9月LPR按兵不动:1年期3.35% 5年期以上3.85%】中国人民银行授权全国银行间同业拆借中心公布,2024年9月20日贷款市场

汇评 august 发布回评
august 发布回评august 发布回评august 发布回评august 发布回评

新闻 august发布测试august发布测试august发布测试august发布测试
august发布测试august发布测试auaugust发布测试august发布测试august发布测试august发布测试august发布测试august发布测试august发布测试august发布测试august发布测试august发布测试august发布测试august发布测试august发布测试august发布测试august发布测试august发布测试gust发布测试

新闻 测试数据
测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据测试数据

新闻 跌哭了!A股失守2900点,科创50下杀跌破800点,创业板单边下行再创新低!A股距离见底还有多远?
A股失守2900点,科创50下杀跌破800点,创业板单边下行再创新低!A股距离见底还有多远?
Wiki问答
In what ways does Tiger Markets(test)'s regulatory standing help safeguard my funds?
Based on my experience as a forex trader, I've learned that regulatory oversight is one crucial factor when evaluating a broker's reliability, especially regarding the safety of client funds. Tiger Markets (test) claims to be regulated in Cyprus under a CYSEC license and appears to employ a Straight Through Processing (STP) model. Regulation in Cyprus theoretically means the broker must follow certain financial and procedural standards, such as maintaining segregated accounts and reporting regularly to authorities, which can reduce some risks of misconduct or insolvency. However, what stood out to me is the medium potential risk rating and exposures posted by users, particularly frequent complaints about withdrawal issues and trade execution problems. This pattern gives me pause, because robust regulation should, in principle, help protect traders from these exact scenarios by providing avenues for recourse and ensuring accountability. In my view, while CYSEC regulation might offer some framework for client protection, it's not a guarantee of safety or reliable operations. I've seen that regulation can help, but it's not a substitute for careful due diligence on a broker’s business practices, responsiveness, and transparency. For me, Tiger Markets (test)'s regulatory status could offer some safeguards in theory, but the user complaints indicate gaps that merit caution before considering any substantial deposit.
What's the smallest amount I’m allowed to withdraw at once from my Tiger Markets (test) account?
As an experienced trader who evaluates brokers with care, I have to say that with Tiger Markets (test), I was unable to determine a clear minimum withdrawal amount from the information presented. I always prioritize transparent withdrawal terms because the ability to access funds efficiently is a key trust factor for me. In my own trading, I have encountered situations where lack of clarity around withdrawal policies created unnecessary delays and concerns, so I scrutinize this aspect closely. For Tiger Markets (test), despite their mention of accepted funding methods such as VISA, Neteller, Master, and bank transfers, I did not find specific figures or conditions relating to the smallest withdrawal allowed. This is essential information; without it, I have to exercise heightened caution. Additionally, I noticed several user reports highlighting withdrawal difficulties on this platform, which, combined with a medium risk and some regulatory ambiguities, raises concerns about reliability and fund accessibility. Given the lack of publicly listed minimums and the experiences shared by other users, I recommend proceeding very carefully and making sure you verify withdrawal terms directly with their support before depositing. When real money is at stake, especially in forex, I cannot overstate the importance of clear, upfront policies and responsive customer service. For me, this lack of transparency is a significant red flag.
Could you give an in-depth overview of the fee structure for Tiger Markets (test), covering both commission charges and spreads?
As an experienced trader, my assessment of Tiger Markets (test) makes it clear that understanding their fee structure is challenging due to a significant lack of transparency. From my research, I couldn’t find detailed or reliable information about the specific spreads, commission charges, or even the minimum deposit required. Though some data fields reference numbers for “minimum deposit” and “commission,” it’s unclear whether these are placeholders or valid figures, making it impossible for me to confidently factor them into any trading cost calculations. What gives me pause is the absence of clear data on spreads—which is critical information for everyday cost management as a trader. Reliable brokers generally publish detailed tables for both commission and spread structures on major currency pairs, but here, there’s none of that clarity. Furthermore, while the platform claims to offer “Straight Through Processing (STP)” and cTrader, that alone doesn’t guarantee tight spreads or competitive commissions. The fee structure’s opacity is further complicated by user complaints regarding withdrawal issues and platform function, raising concerns about overall trustworthiness. As a rule, I need to see clear, independently verifiable cost disclosures before committing funds to any broker. For me, the lack of transparency around the actual fee structure at Tiger Markets (test) is a cautionary red flag and something that should not be overlooked.
Does Tiger Markets offer a swap-free (Islamic) account option for traders?
From my careful review of the available data, I could not find any explicit indication that Tiger Markets offers a swap-free (Islamic) account option. In my own trading, especially when considering brokers for religious compliance or for a specific trading strategy, the clear availability and documented terms of swap-free accounts are crucial, as these accounts are designed to comply with Sharia law by removing interest charges on overnight positions. When I look for this feature, I expect to see detailed information regarding eligibility, application process, and any potential administrative fees. Unfortunately, Tiger Markets’ information does not specify this kind of account, and several core aspects like the minimum deposit structure and account features are either unclear or missing. Additionally, the presence of unresolved user complaints—particularly about withdrawal difficulties and position closure issues—gives me further pause when evaluating the trustworthiness of their offerings. If swap-free trading is a vital requirement, I would personally be hesitant to proceed with Tiger Markets until they provide more transparent and comprehensive disclosures about their account types and operational policies. For now, in my assessment, traders seeking an Islamic account should be extremely cautious and look for more straightforward confirmations from the broker before considering them.
用户评价 6
你要评价的内容
请输入...
评价 6
该交易商为样例交易商
数据均为测试数据
我已知晓







下一次看海约在哪
爱尔兰
为什么总是让我碰到无法出金的平台,好苦恼
曝光
Serendipity8888
美国
最近无法出金,多次沟通无效,在此曝光此平台的恶劣行径,希望有关部门引起重视,追回资金,重谢
曝光
7778889
香港
good 好的交易商
中评
7778889
香港
好的平台好的平台
好评
Serendipity8888
日本
中
中评
Serendipity8888
日本
好
好评